期刊文献+

三种空间技术测定地壳运动的比较 被引量:1

COMPARISON AMONG CRUSTAL MOVEMENTS MEASURED WITH THREE SPACE TECHNIQUES
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 讨论甚长基线干涉测量(VLBI)、卫星激光测距(SLR)和全球定位系统(GPS)3种空间观测技术在测定地壳运动中是否存在系统差。在考虑垂向变化率的情况下,用地心坐标速度解算并置站间基线长度变化率;然后对这3种技术的基线长度变化率进行两两线性拟合,并进行相关性分析。计算结果表明,3种观测技术测定的地壳运动是一致的:VLBI和GPS测定的基线长度变化率差异较小,比SLR的相应值系统性偏大约10%;GPS与SLR测定的基线长度变化率值有约3mm/a的常数差,而VLBI与SLR测定的基线长度变化率相应值有不到1mm/a的常数差。 It is dicussed whether the systematic errors exist or not in crustal movement monitoring by three space observation techniques i.e. VLBI, SLR and GPS. Taking account of vertical change rate, the baseline length changing rates of co-located sites are solved by use of velocity of geocentric coordinations, and these rates are fitted pair to pair, and then their correlativities are analyzed. The computed results show that the crustal movements measured by this three techniques are consistent with each others:the difference between the baseline length changing rates by VLBI and GPS is small, and about 10% larger than that by SLR,there is a constant difference of about 3 mm/a between those by GPS and SLR,but less than 1 mm/a between those by VLBI and SLR.
出处 《大地测量与地球动力学》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期127-130,共4页 Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40474014)
关键词 VLBI SLR GPS 地壳运动 基线长度变化率 VLBI SLR GPS crustal movement changing rate of baseline length
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈俊勇.空间大地测量技术对确定地面坐标框架、地形变与地球重力场的贡献和进展——出席2005年国际大地测量协会(IAG)科学大会札记[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(10):1053-1058. 被引量:4
  • 2[1]IGN.Instituto Geográfico Nacional[EB/OL].http://itrf.ensg.ign.fr/ITRF_ solutions/2005/ITRF2005.php,2006-10-05.
  • 3[2]ALTAMIMI Z,SILLARD P,BOUCHER C.ITRF2000:A New Release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth Science Applications[J].J.Geophys.Res.,2002,107(B10):2 214.
  • 4[3]RAY J,DONG D,ALTAMIMI Z.IGS Reference Frames:Status and Future Improvements[A].Position Paper at IGS 2004 Workshop in Berne[C].[s.l.]:[s.n.],2004.
  • 5[4]ALTAMIMI Z,SILLARD P,BOUCHER C.The Impact of a No-Net-Rotation Condition on ITRF2000[J].Geophys.Res.Lett,2003,30(2):1 064.
  • 6[5]ARGUS D F,GORDON R G.Tests of the Rigid-plate Hypothesis and Bounds on Intraplate Deformation Using Geodetic Data from very Long Baseline Interferometry[J].J.Geophys.Res.,1996,101:13 555-13 572.
  • 7[6]BIRD P.An Updated Digital Model of Plate Boundaries[J].Geochem.Geophys.Geosyst.,2003,4(3):1 027.
  • 8[7]REMI F.Call for ITRF2004 and Supplementation of IERS CPP[EB/OL].http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsmail/2004/msg00287.html,2004-12-21.
  • 9Wang Qi, Zhang Peizhen , Jeffrey T. Freymueller, et al. Present-day crustal deformation in China constrained by global positioning system measurements[J], Science,2001,294:574-577.
  • 10Altamimi Z. The International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2005 (ITRF 2005 ) [ A ]. Proceeding of IAG/FIG Symposium. Geodetic Reference Frames GRF2006 [ C ]. Munich,2006.

共引文献98

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部