期刊文献+

基于模糊神经网络的交合分析改进方法 被引量:4

An Improved Conjoint Analysis Based on FNN
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了克服传统交合分析法(CA)存在的总体效用模型可能会失效及没有较好反映评价问题内在复杂作用关系和没有考虑到专家主观判断不准确性的缺陷,本文借鉴从定性到定量综合集成的复杂系统分析方法论,应用模糊神经网络技术,提出一种基于模糊神经网络的交合分析改进方法。该方法能够比较有效地近似反映出复杂系统蕴含的、难以为专家识别的内在复杂作用机理,因而是一种能够适应各种系统评价问题的一般性、普适性方法。数值验证的结果表明,应用基于模糊神经网络的交合分析改进方法得出的待评价对象排序结果明显好于传统CA法。这说明该方法不但是科学的,而且是比传统CA法更为有效的。 Such drawbacks of CA as probably being invalid under some conditions, having not enough ability to well reflect inherent relations of complex systems, and not considering the inaccurate characteristic of evaluations given by valuators, are pointed out. To overcome the three drawbacks, according to the thought of the meta-synthesis from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis of complex system theory, and based on the theory of the technique of fuzzy neural network, the improved CA based on FNN is presented. The distinguished advantages of the presented approach lie in that it can well capture inherent relations of complex systems, and thus it is a general approach. The results of numerical demonstration analysis show that the rank of evaluated objects got by the developed approach is much closer to the real, and proves to be more reasonable than the classical CA.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2008年第1期117-124,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70471015) 吉林大学创新基金项目(2004g11)
关键词 交合分析法 模糊神经网络 语言型信息 系统机理 conjoint analysis fuzzy neural network linguistic information system mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Luce R. D. ,Tukey J. W.. Simultaneous conjoint measurement:A new type of fundamental measurement [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964,1 (1):1 -- 27.
  • 2Lee J.,Cho Y. S.,Lee J. J.,Lee C. Y.. Forecasting future demand for large-screen television sets using conjoint analysis with diffusion model [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006,73 (4) : 362 -- 376.
  • 3Rohae M.. Conjoint analysis as a new methodology for Korean typography guideline in Web environment [J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2003,32(5):341--348.
  • 4Probert E. J. ,Dawson G. F. ,Cockrill A.. Evaluating preference within the compositing industry in Wales using a conjoint analysis approach [J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling,2005,45(2):128--141.
  • 5Pullman M. E. ,Moore W. L. ,Wardell D. G.. A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design [J]. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002,19 (5) : 354-364.
  • 6Sethuraman R., Kerin R. A., Cron W. L.. A field study comparing online and offline data collection methods for identifying product attribute preferences using conjoint analysis [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005,58(5) :602--610.
  • 7沈浩,柯惠新.结合分析的原理和应用[J].数理统计与管理,1998,17(4):39-45. 被引量:32
  • 8Mishra S. , Umesh U. N.. Determining the quality of conjoint analysis results using violation of a priori signs [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005,58 (3) : 301 -- 311.
  • 9Noguchi H. ,Ishii H.. Methods for determining the statistical part worth value of factors in conjoint analysis [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling,2000,al (10-12):261-271.
  • 10Gentil S, ,Montmain J,, Hierarchical representation of complex systems for supporting human decision making [J]. Advanced Engineering Informaties, 2004, 18:143--159

二级参考文献13

  • 1Pal S K, De R K, Basak J. Unsupervised feature evaluation: A neuro-fuzzy approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,2000, 11(2): 366---376.
  • 2Jain B A, Nag B N. Perfonnanee evaluation of neural network decision models [J]. Journal of Management Infonnation Systems,1997, 14 (2) : 201--216.
  • 3Skibniewski M, Chao LiChung. Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1992, 118 (3) : 577--593.
  • 4Lofti A Zadeh. Soft computing and fuzzy logic [J]. IEEE Software, 1994, 11(6): 48--56.
  • 5De R K, Basak J, Pal S K. Neuro-fuzzy feature evaluation with theoretical analysis [ J ]. Neural Networks, 1999, 12 (10):1429---1455.
  • 6柯惠新,数理统计与管理,1994年,13卷,6期
  • 7柯惠新,调查研究中的统计分析法,1992年
  • 8王宗军.综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(1):73-79. 被引量:243
  • 9荣莉莉,王众托.用模糊神经网络建立GNP与产业结构的关系模型[J].大连理工大学学报,1999,39(1):114-119. 被引量:6
  • 10毛定祥.基于多元统计分析和模糊综合评判的企业财务信用综合评价[J].上海大学学报(自然科学版),2000,6(3):261-265. 被引量:12

共引文献42

同被引文献58

  • 1姜伟,付佳媛.最小二乘法及其应用[J].中国传媒大学学报(自然科学版),2020(5):72-78. 被引量:19
  • 2陈贵敏,贾建援,韩琪.粒子群优化算法的惯性权值递减策略研究[J].西安交通大学学报,2006,40(1):53-56. 被引量:317
  • 3颜佳华,宁国良,盛明科.基于BP神经网络的电子政务绩效评价研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(6):125-130. 被引量:35
  • 4HAGAN M T, DEMUTH H B, BEALE M. Neural Network Design [M]. Beijing: China Machine press, .2002.
  • 5DECO G, EBMEYER J. Corse Coding Resource-Allocating-Network [J]. Neural Computation, 1993, 5 (1) : 105-114.
  • 6ISSANCHOU S, GAUCHI J. Computer-Aided Optimal Designs for Improving Neural Network Generalization [ J ]. Neural Networks, 2008, 21 (7): 945-950.
  • 7HOLMSTRON L, KOISTINEN P. Using Additive Noise in Back-Propagation Training [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1992, 3 (1) : 24-38.
  • 8LIANG Y C, FENG D P, LEE H P, et al. Successive Approximation Training Algorithm for Feedforward Neural Networks [J]. Neurocomputing, 2002, 42 (1) : 311-322.
  • 9BOUSQUET O, ELISSEEFF A. Stability and Generalization [ J ]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2002, 2 ( 3 ) : 499-526.
  • 10CHAPELLE O, VAPNIK V N, BENGIO Y. Model Selection for Small-Sample Regression [ J ]. Machine Learning, 2002, 48 (1-3) : 9-23.

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部