摘要
人民检察院的刑事审判监督权遭受学界部分学者的质疑。但是,从检察制度生成的历史来看,检察官角色产生的主要目的之一便是监督、制约法官;从比较法的角度看,由检察官行使审判监督权,对法官的程序违法行为实施监督,也符合大陆法系国家检察官角色的基本定位;从现实的角度来看,检察官行使审判监督权包括庭审监督权并不会破坏审判的独立性、中立性以及控辩双方的平等性,因此,检察机关行使审判监督权具有法理合理性。
The power of trial supervision of the People＇s Procuratorate has been widely criticized by Chinese scholars. However, historically, to supervise and restrict the power of judges is one of the main aims for instituting the prosecutors; from the perspective of comparative law, to supervise the judges＇ illegal procedural action by prosecutors accords with the basic orientation of the prosecutors＇ role in Continental countries; in reality, criminal trial supervision, including supervision of the trial process, does not undermine the independence, neutrality of the trial and the equality of the parties. Therefore, it is legitimate in legal principle for prosecutors to utilize the power of trial supervision.
出处
《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2008年第1期22-31,共10页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
教育部人文社科研究一般项目(06JC820007)
关键词
刑事审判监督
检察官
法官
庭审监督
criminal trial supervision
prosecutor
judge
supervision of the trial process
