期刊文献+

右心室流出道起搏对心室收缩同步性和心功能的影响 被引量:3

Right ventricular outflow tract pacing protect ventricular contraction synchrony and function
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的本文通过组织多普勒技术分别评价右心室流出道(right ventricular outflow tract,RVOT)起搏和右心室心尖部(right ventricular apex,RVA)起搏对心室收缩同步性和心功能的影响。方法将42例无器质性心脏病的心动过缓患者随机分到 RVA 组(n=14)和 RVOT 组(n=28),起搏器植入术后通过三维超声心动图,将 RVOT 组进一步分为右心室流出道间隔部(right ventricular septum,RVS)组(n=17)和右心室流出道游离壁(right ventricular free wall,RVFW)组(n=11)。通过 QRS 时限、肺动脉射血前间期-主动脉射血前间期(PPEI-APEI)及左心室收缩不同步指数(Ts-SD)评价心室的电机械活动同步性;通过射血分数(ejection factor,EF)及 Tei 指数评价心室功能。结果 (1)起搏后各组的 QRS 时限、PPEI-APEI 和 Ts-SD 都显著增加(P<0.01)。(2)RVA 组和 RVOT 组起搏后 QRS 时限分别为(155.1±12.4)ms 和(143.5±6.7)ms,PPEI-APEI 分别为(-34.85±8.03)ms 和(-28.61±7.79)ms,Ts-SD 分别为(48.72±3.83)ms 和(41.91±3.56)ms(P<0.05)。术后6个月,RVOT 组的心功能指标要优于 RVA 组,两组 Tei 指数分别为0.507±0.08和0.418±0.05(P<0.05)。(3)亚组分析显示,RVA 组、RVFW 组和 RVS 组的 QRS 时限分别为(155.1±12.4)ms、(1473.±5.7)ms 和(141.0±6.2)ms(RVA=RVFW>RVS),PPEI~APEI 分别为(-34.85±8.03)ms、(-36.64±3.20)ms 和(-23.41±4.78)ms(RVA=RVFW>RVS),Ts-SD 分别为(48.72±3.83)ms、(44.65±3.23)ms 和(40.13±2.50)ms(RVA>RVFW>RVS)。术后3个月,3组 Tei 指数分别为0.464±0.063、0.449±0.029和0.393±0.047(RVA=RVFW>RVS)。结论 RVS 起搏后心室同步性优于 RVFW 和 RVA,有助于保护心室功能。 Objective This study used tissue Doppler imaging to compare the differences between right ventricular apex(RVA)and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)pacing in contraction synchrony and ventricular function. Methods Forty-two patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10. 4 years) without structural heart disease were randomized into RVA group (n = 14) and RVOT group (n =28). RVOT group was further divided into right ventricular septum(RVS) group ( n = 17 ) and right ventricular free wall (RVFW) group ( n = 11 ) by 3D-echocardiography. Patients were followed up 1,3,6 months after implantation. Ventricular synchrony was evaluated by QRS duration, PPEI - APEI and Ts-SD, and ventricular function was appraised by Tei index. Resuits Compared with intrinsic rhythm, the QRS duration, PPEI - APEI and Ts-SD were significantly changed during ventricular pacing in all groups. The mean QRS duration was ( 155. 1 ± 12. 4) ms for RVA pacing and (143.5 ±6.7)ms for RVOT pacing (P〈0. 001). The PPEI -APEI was ( -34.85 ±8.03)ms for RVA pacing and ( -28. 61 ±7. 79)ms for RVOT pacing (P =0. 02). Ts-SD was (48.72 ±3.83)ms for RVA pacing and(41.91 ±3.56)ms for RVOT pacing (P 〈0. 001). At 6 months after pacing, the Tei index was 0. 507 ± 0. 08 for RVA pacing and 0. 418 ± 0. 05 for RVOT pacing ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Sub-group analysis showed that the mean QRS duration for RVA, RVFW and RVS pacing was ( 155. 1 ± 12. 4) ms, ( 147.5 ± 5.7) ms, ( 141.0 ± 6. 2) ms (RVA=RVFW 〉RVS); the PPEI-APEI was ( -34.85 ±8.03)ms, ( -36.64±3.20)ms and (-23.41±4.78)ms (RVA=RVFW 〉RVS); Ts-SD was (48.72 ±3.83)ms, (44. 65 ±3.23)ms and (40. 13 ± 2. 50) ms ( RVA 〉 RVFW 〉 RVS). The mean Tei-index was 0. 464 ± 0. 063, 0. 449 ± 0. 029 and 0. 393 ± 0. 047 for RVA, RVFW and RVS group 3 months after implantation ( RVA = RVFW 〉 RVS). Con- ~lusions RVS pacing has a less adverse effect on contraction synchrony than RVA and RVFW pacing, and could protect ventricular function better.
出处 《中华心律失常学杂志》 2007年第6期465-470,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
关键词 右心室流出道 起搏 同步性 TEI指数 Right ventricular outflow tract Pacing Synchrony Tei index
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Wiggers CJ. The muscle reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli. Am J Physiol,1925 ,73 :346-378.
  • 2Tse HF, Wong KK, Tsang V, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effects of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,40:1451-1458.
  • 3Prinzen FW, Cheriex EC, Delhas T, et al. Asymmetric thickness of the left ventricular wall resulting from asynchronous electric activation:a study in dogs with ventricular pacing and in patients with left bundle branch block. Am Heart J, 1995,130 : 1045-1053.
  • 4孙欣,王浩,牛红霞.超声心动图评价束支传导阻滞患者左右心室间收缩失同步[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(2):233-235. 被引量:12
  • 5Yu CM, Lin H, Fung WH, et al. Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and fight ventricular pacing for heart failure. Am Heart J, 2003,145:E18.
  • 6Yu CM, Fung WH, Lin H, et al. Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol, 2003,91:684-688.
  • 7史浩颖,汪芳,孟伟栋,张峰,孙雅萍,孙宝贵.组织多普勒评价右室不同部位起搏对左室收缩功能和同步性的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(11):1002-1005. 被引量:42
  • 8Schwaab B, Frohlig G, Alexander C, et al. Influence of right ventricular stimulation site on left ventricular function in atrial synchronous ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33 : 317- 323.
  • 9Buckingham TA, Candinas R, Schlapfer J, et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrioventricular pacing at differing sites in the right ventricle individually and simultaneously. PACE, 1997,20:909-915.

二级参考文献14

  • 1史浩颖,潘翠珍,舒先红,汪芳,金炜,张建军,陈岗,孙宝贵.组织多普勒技术评价双心室同步起搏即刻疗效[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(1):26-29. 被引量:23
  • 2Knebel F,Reibis RK,Bondke H,et al.Tissue Doppler echocardiography and biventricular pacing in heart failure:patient selection,procedural guidance,follow-up,quantification of success[J].Cardiovasc Ultrasound,2004,2(1):17-30.
  • 3Yu CM,Lin H,Ho PC,et al.Assessment of left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic synchronicity in normal subjects by tissue Doppler echocardiography and the effects of age and heart rate[J].Echocardiography,2003,20(1):19-27.
  • 4Ghio S,Constantin C,Klersy C,et al.Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony are common in heart failure patients,regardless of QRS duration[J].Eur Heart J,2004,25(7):571-578.
  • 5Grines CL,Bashore TM,Boudoulas H,et al.Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block:the effect of interventricular asynchrony[J].Circulation,1989,79(4):845-853.
  • 6Quintana M,Saha S,Rohani M,et al.Electromechanical coupling,uncoupling,and ventricular function in patients with bundle branch block:a tissue-Doppler echocardiographic study[J].Echocardiography,2004,21(8):687-698.
  • 7Penicka M,Bartunek J,De Bruyne B,et al.Improvement of left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy is predicted by tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography[J].Circulation,2004,109(8):978-983.
  • 8Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Pedersen AK, et al. Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation,2002,106 : 2078-2084.
  • 9Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Kim WY, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40: 723-730.
  • 10Michael CG, Peter PK. Alternative site pacing: it′s time to define terms. Pace,1999,22: 551-553.

共引文献52

同被引文献42

  • 1史浩颖,汪芳,孟伟栋,张峰,孙雅萍,孙宝贵.组织多普勒评价右室不同部位起搏对左室收缩功能和同步性的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(11):1002-1005. 被引量:42
  • 2Barold SS.Modern cardiac pacing[M].New York:Futura Publishing Co.1985.
  • 3Lamas GA,Lee KL,Sweeney MO,et al.Mode Select Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction.Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction[J].N Engl J Med,2002,347(23):1891-1892.
  • 4Toff WD,Skehan JD,Bono DP,et al.The Unite Kingdom pacing and cardiovascular events trial[J].Heart,1997,78(3):221-223.
  • 5Sweeney MO,Bank AJ,Nsah E,Koullick M,et al.Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease[J].N Engl J Med,2007,357(10):1000-1008.
  • 6Anselme F,Saoudi N,Cribier A.Pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation:the PIPAF studies[J].J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2000,4(Suppl 1):177-184.
  • 7Saksena S,Prakash A,Ziegler P,et al.Improvedsuppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40(6):1140-1150.
  • 8Padeletti L,Pürerfellner H,Adler SW,et al.Combined efficacy of atrial septal lead placement and atrial pacing algorithms for prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2003,14(11):1189-1195.
  • 9Victor F,Mobo P,Mansour H,et al.A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus right ventricular pacing:short-term results[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2006,17(3):282-242.
  • 10De Cock CC,Giudici MC,Twisk JW.Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing:a quantitative review[J].Europace,2003,5(3):275-278.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部