摘要
海德格尔与梅洛-庞蒂在空间性问题上之所以会形成不同的看法,一个重要的原因在于他们对"身体性"概念的理解不同。海德格尔否定了通过身体性来理解空间性的理路,认为身体性并不能从根本上阐明空间性,唯有通过"在世界之中存在"这一源始的生存论结构,空间性才能得到合理的说明,但最终却陷入了理论困境。而梅洛-庞蒂则认为没有身体就没有空间,我们是借助身体来把握外部空间的,身体图式是我们进入空间和获得空间认识的方式,"身体性"在空间性的本质建构中具有源始的和奠基的地位。梅洛-庞蒂的身体理论为解决海德格尔的理论困境提供了一种新的可能。
It is principally because of their different understandings of the concept of corporality that made Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty differ from each other on the issue of spatiality. Heidegger denies the way of interpreting spatiality through the analysis of corporality, thinking that spatiality can＇t be radically elucidated by corporality other than reasonably explained by the original structure of survival of ＂being-in-the-world＂. But he eventually lands himself in deep theoretical trouble. Oppositely, Merleau-Ponty thinks that there will be no space without corporality. People control the outside space by means of corporality, and the schema of corporality is a way by which people enter into space and get to know it. Corporality is taken as the primitive foundation in the substantial construction of spatiality. Merleau-Ponty＇s theory of corporality offers a new possibility for us to release ourselves from Heidegger＇s theoretical trouble.
出处
《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第1期18-22,共5页
Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
