期刊文献+

薄层液基细胞学技术对宫颈疾病诊断价值评价 被引量:8

Evaluation of ThinPrep Cytology Test in Cervical Pathologic Alteration
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价薄层液基细胞学检测方法(TCT)对宫颈疾病的诊断价值。方法收集2006年1-12月在山西医科大学第二医院妇科住院病人的资料,选择做过TCT检查并追踪到有确切组织病理学诊断结果的462例病例为研究对象,以病理学诊断结果为金标准,评价TCT检测的诊断价值。结果462例住院病人中,经TCT检出宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和腺癌(AC)19例、鳞状上皮内高度病变(HSIL)28例、鳞状上皮内低度病变(LSIL)15例、意义不明的不典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)和腺细胞(AGUS)35例、正常(WNL)365例。以病理学诊断结果为金标准,TCT检测的灵敏度为94.7%,特异度93.8%,约登指数为0.885,阳性似然比15.27,阴性似然比0.06,总符合率为93.7%,Kappa值0.79,阳性预测值74.2%,阴性预测值98.5%。TCT与组织病理学诊断结果的阳性符合率在宫颈癌中为95.0%,在HSIL、LSIL中分别为82.4%和68.2%。TCT检测对宫颈癌和HSIL的阳性符合率高于LSIL(P<0.05)。结论TCT检测对宫颈病变的诊断价值较高,特别是对宫颈癌和HSIL。 Objective To study the efficacy of ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) in cervical lesions. Methods The clinical data of 462 gynecologic inpatients diagnosed by both TCT and histopathology were collected in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from Jan. 2006 to Oct. 2006. Histopathological results were used as gold standard to calculate the indices of diagnostic effectiveness evaluation of TCT technique. Results A total of 462 cases were detected by TCT, and the testing results showed 19 cervical cancer, 28 HSIL, 15 LSIL, 35 ASC - US and AUGS, and 365 cases within normal limits (WNL). The sensitivity and specificity of TCT was 94.7 % and 93.8% respectively. The Youden' s index was 0. 885. Positive likelihood ratio was 15.27, while negative likelihood ratio was 0.06. The consistency rate was 93.7 %. Kappa value was 0.79. Positive predictive value was 74.2%, while negative predictive value was 98.5%. The positive consistency rate of TCT and histopathology diagnosis was 95.0% in cervical cancer, 82.4% in HSIL and 68.2% in LSIL. Chi square test displayed the diagnosis of cervical cancer and HSIL was better than that of LSIL significantly among TCT and pathologic histology (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions: The TCT technique shows highly diagnostic efficacy, it is an efficient diagnostic test for CIN and cervical cancer.
出处 《实用预防医学》 CAS 2007年第6期1724-1726,共3页 Practical Preventive Medicine
关键词 新柏氏液基细胞学检测技术(TCT) 宫颈病变 诊断效果评价 ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) Cervical lesions Diagnostic efficacy evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Behtash N,Mehrdad N.Cervical cancer:screening and prevention[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2006,7(4):683-686.
  • 2Liverani M,De Paola F,Danesi S,et al.Applicative aspects of liquidbased cytology in cervical cancer screening[J].Pathologica,2006,98(6):629-634.
  • 3Piaton Eric,Jacqueline Fa(y)nel,Hutin Karine,et al.Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep processing of urinary samples:a qualitative approach[J].BMC Clinical Pathology,2005,5:9.
  • 4李琴艳,杨庆忠,付雯.TCT与巴氏细胞学在宫颈癌筛查中的对比研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(9):1173-1174. 被引量:29
  • 5Solomon D.Bet hesda System 2001[J].Acta Cytologica,2001,46 (1):6-7.
  • 6Biscotti CV,O' Brien DL,Gero MA,et al.Thin-layer Pap test vs.conventional Pap smear.Analysis of 400 split samples[J].J Reprod Med.2002,47(1):9-13.
  • 7乔友林,章文华,李凌,潘秦镜,杨玲,吴令英,戍寿德,李爱玲,张询,任生达,Belinson J.子宫颈癌筛查方法的横断面比较研究[J].中国医学科学院学报,2002,24(1):50-53. 被引量:351
  • 8Abulafia O,Pezzullo JC,Sherer DM.Performance of ThinPrep liquid -based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears:a quantitative survey[J].Gynecol Oncol,2003,90(1):137-144.
  • 9杨玲,乔友林,李楠,张荀,孔令华,戎寿德,马俊飞,J Belinson.子宫颈癌多个筛查试验的综合评价及聚类分析[J].肿瘤防治研究,2001,28(4):253-255. 被引量:14
  • 10陈棠娇.液基细胞学与阴道镜检查在宫颈病变诊断中的相互作用[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(8):22-23. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

  • 1陈平雁,胡琳.评价诊断试验的信息量方法[J].中国卫生统计,1994,11(2):3-8. 被引量:9
  • 2张建国,刘璐.诊断试验的平均信息量及其应用[J].中国卫生统计,1995,12(6):16-19. 被引量:2
  • 3卫生部肿瘤防治研究办公室.中国恶性肿瘤死亡调查研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1979,1..
  • 4张建国.诊断试验一种新的综合评价指标[J].中国卫生统计,1992,9(6):8-10.
  • 5Belinson J,Int J Gynecol Cancer,1999年,9卷,411页
  • 6方积乾,医学统计学与电脑实验,1997年,286页
  • 7张建国,中国卫生统计,1992年,9卷,6期,8页
  • 8陈平雁,中国卫生,1990年,7卷,2期,22页
  • 9Belinson J,A Cross-Sectional Comparative Trial Of Multiple Techniques To Detect Cervical Intraepithelial Neopla
  • 10曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.2129.

共引文献384

同被引文献49

引证文献8

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部