期刊文献+

主动脉内球囊反搏辅助老年急性冠脉综合征患者介入治疗临床疗效分析 被引量:2

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of intra-aortic balloon pump in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome during the percutaneous coronary intervention
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价老年急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者在主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)辅助下进行介入治疗的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析160例ACS患者在IABP辅助下行介入治疗的临床资料,按年龄分为两组:中青年组(年龄<60岁)58例,老年组(年龄≥60岁)102例。对两组的手术成功率、住院期间不良事件及IABP相关并发症进行对比分析。结果两组手术成功率分别为98.3%,97.1%;院内存活率分别为89.7%,83.3%;IABP相关并发症发生率分别为3.4%,5.9%。上述差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论IABP辅助介入治疗老年ACS患者具有与中青年ACS患者应用时相似的临床疗效及安全性。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) during the percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 160 patients with ACS who underwent implantation of IABP via femoral artery during PCI. The patients were divided into two groups in terms of age: middle age and young group (under 60 years of age) included 58 cases,elderly group (60 years or older)102 cases. The successful rate of PCI procedure,the complications of IABP and the inhospital survival rate were summarized. Results Under the support of IABP , 160 patients with ACS underwent PCI. The successful rates of PCI procedure of the two groups were 98.3% and 97.1% (P〉0.05). The inhospital survival rates were 89.7% and 83.3% (P〉0.05). The complication rates with IABP were 3.4% and 5.9% (P〉0.05). There were no statistical difference in these respects between the two groups. Conclusions The clinical therapeutic efficacy and safety of IABP during the PCI in elderly patients with ACS are similiar to those in the middle age and young group.
出处 《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》 2007年第6期399-402,406,共5页 Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
关键词 老年 冠脉综合征 急性 主动脉内球囊反搏 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 aged coronary syndrome, acute intra aortic balloon pump percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Blackman DJ,Fergusen JD,Spfigings DC,et al.Revascularization for acute coronary syndromes in older peopie.Age Ageing,2003,32:129-135.
  • 2[2]Goldberg RJ,Gore JM,Thompson CA,et al.Recent magnitude of and temporal trends(1994-1997)in the incidence and hospital death rates of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction:the second national registry of myocardial infarction.Am Heart J,2001,141:65.
  • 3[4]ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Assosiation Task Force on Practice Guidelines(ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).J Circulation,2006,113:166-286.
  • 4[5]Boucher JM,Racine N,Thanh TH,et al.Age-related differences in in-hospital mortality and the use of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.Can Med Assoc J,2001,164:1285-1290.
  • 5[6]Soumerai SB,MeLaughlin TJ,Ross-Degnan D,et al.Effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly:cause for concern in the old-old.Arch Intern Med,2002,162:561-568.
  • 6[7]Darowski M,De Lanzzari C,Ferrari G,et al.The influence of simultaneous intra-aortic balloon pumping and mechanical ventilation on hemodynamic parameters-numerical simulation.Front Med Biol Eng,1999,9:155-174.
  • 7[8]Pego-Fernandes PM,Stolf NA,Moreira LF,et al.Influence of biopump with and without intraaortic balloon on the coronary and carotid flow.Ann Thorac Surg,2000,69:536-540.
  • 8[9]Barron HV,Every NR,Parsons LS,et al.The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J,2001,141:933-939.
  • 9王守力,韩雅玲,荆全民,王祖禄,王冬梅,邓捷,杨桂棠,于海波.床旁主动脉内球囊反搏术在急性冠脉综合征并发心源性休克救治中的应用[J].第四军医大学学报,2005,26(9):831-833. 被引量:17

二级参考文献7

  • 1Duaerman HL,Goldberg RJ. Treatment options for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock[J]. Cardiol Rev, 2000;8:207-215.
  • 2Barron HV,Every NR,Parsons LS,et al. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction 2[J]. Am Heart J,2001;141:933-939.
  • 3Ohman EM, Hochman JS. Aortic counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: Physiologically important but does the patient benefit? [J]. Am Heart J, 2001;141:889-892.
  • 4Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The task force on the management of acute myocardial infarction of the European society of cardiology[J]. Eur Heart, 2003;24:28-66.
  • 5Dauerman H, Goldberg RJ, White K, et al. Revascularization, stenting, and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2002;90:838-842.
  • 6朱强,栾怡平,王波.心梗患者QT离散度与心率变异性的关系(英文)[J].第四军医大学学报,2001,22(21):1949-1952. 被引量:9
  • 7李寰,张玉顺,胡涛,贾国良.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗对QT离散度的影响及其意义[J].第四军医大学学报,2001,22(21):1982-1984. 被引量:7

共引文献16

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部