期刊文献+

中国崛起与美国:权力持平与文明的磨合 被引量:5

United States and China's Rise: Parity and the Mohe of Civilizations
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在可见的未来内,中国快速的经济增长使得其经济实力接近美国的可能性越来越大。这一增长给美国带来了切实的担忧。除此之外,未来中美经济实力持平的前景也提出了一个问题:当中国实力与美国持平时,中国是否将挑战美国的世界霸主地位?本文认为,"权力持平(parity)"这一概念并不适用于预测未来的中美关系。这是因为,持平意味着中美在经济方面将在某一时刻达到一个大致对等的水平。但是,鉴于中国的人口和地缘政治现实,仅有一个方面的实力持平并不能决定,甚至并不能有信心地预测到中美关系的未来趋势。中美关系的互动过程可能是一个充满矛盾和不断调和的曲折过程。它将是文明的磨合过程,而不是文明的冲突。 China' s remarkable economic growth raises the possibility that China' s economic capacity may approximate that of the United States in the foreseeable future. Besides the specific concerns that China' s growth poses for the United States, China' s economic approximation raises the question of whether or not China will challenge the United States for world hegemony when it reaches parity with the United States. This paper argues that parity is not a useful concept in the forecasting of future US-China relations. Parity implies a point of symmetry in economic situations, but given China' s demographic and geo-political realities, a single crossover point with the United States cannot be designated, even if future trends could be predicted with confidence. China' s approximation of the U- nited States deserves analysis in its own right rather than as a precursor to a hypothetical parity. The process of interaction in US-China relations is likely to be a zigzag path of friction and aeeommotation-a mohe ( 磨合) of civilizations rather than a clash of civilizations.
机构地区 弗吉尼亚大学
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 2007年第6期16-25,共10页 Foreign Affairs Review
关键词 中关关系 权力持平 文明磨合 Sino-American relationship power parity mohe (磨合 ) of civilizations
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Ronald Tammen and Jacek Kugler, "Power Transition and China-US Conflicts," Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol.1 (2006), pp. 35-55.
  • 2Richard Bemstein and Ross Munro, "The Coming Conflict with America," Foreign Affairs 76:2 (March/April 1997),pp. 18-32.
  • 3Jane Perlez, "Asian Leaders Find China a More Cordial Neighbor," The New York Times, October 18, 2003.
  • 4Francis Fukuyama, "The End of History," The National Interest, No.16 (Summer 1989), pp. 3-18.
  • 5Francis Fukuyama,The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).
  • 6Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, http://www.sipri.org/.
  • 7John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (N.Y.: W.W. Norton, 2001)
  • 8Michael Swaine and Ashley Tellis, Interpreting China' s Grand Strategy: Past Present and Future (Santa Monica: Rand, 2000) especially pp. 182-230.
  • 9John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).
  • 10World Public Opinion, "Chicago Council Releases Major Study of Public Opinion on the Rise of China and India," October 12, 2006. http://www.worldpublicopinion.org.

同被引文献197

引证文献5

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部