期刊文献+

后路复位植骨内固定治疗腰椎滑脱的临床观察 被引量:4

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨后路椎弓根内固定加椎间植骨融合及椎弓根植骨术在治疗腰椎滑脱中的应用及其临床效果。方法腰椎滑脱者28例,男8例,女20例,采用提拉型RF或GSS椎弓根内固定器械行后路复位内固定加后路椎体间植骨及椎弓根植骨治疗。结果术后随访6~36个月,平均21个月,滑脱的复位率为86%,融合率为90.9%,无再滑脱现象。结论椎弓根内固定加后路椎间植骨融合及椎弓根植骨治疗腰椎滑脱,能提供稳定的生物力学环境,内固定可靠,椎体间融合良好,经济适用。
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2007年第11期689-690,共2页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Weiner BK,Fraser RD,Peierson M. Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lamar decompressive surger [J]. Spine, 1999,24(1 ) : 62-66.
  • 2何志敏,卢旭华,陈德玉.腰椎椎间融合术临床应用进展[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(6):346-348. 被引量:11
  • 3Lubbers T,Bentlage C ,Sandvoss G. Antevior lumbar interbody fusion as a treatment for chronic refractory lower back pain in clisc degeneration and spondy lolisthesis using canbon cages-stauel alone[J]. Zentralbl Neurochir, 2002,63 (1) : 12-17.
  • 4Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. Chronic low back pain and fusion:a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group [J]. Spine ,2002,27 (11) :1131-1141.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Bagby GW. Orthopedics, 1988, 11(6):931-934.
  • 2Kozak JA, Heiman AE, O'Brien JP. Clin Orthop, 1994, 300:45-51.
  • 3Enker P, Steffer AD. Clin Orthop, 1994, 300:90-101.
  • 4Leong JC, Chow SP, Yau AC. Clin Orthop, 1994, 300:52-63.
  • 5Madan SS, Boeree NR. Eur Spine J, 2003, 12(6):567-575.
  • 6Lee SW, Lira TH, You JW, et al. J Spinal Disord, 2000, 13(2) :150-155.
  • 7Ishihara H, Osada R, Kanamori M0 et al. J Spinal Disord, 2001, 14(2):91-99.
  • 8Mayer MH. Spine, 1997, 22(6),691-699.
  • 9McAfee PC, Ragan JJ, Geis WP, et al. Spine, 1998, 23(13):1476-1484.
  • 10Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Shono Y, et al. Spine, 1993, 18(12) :1677-1688.

共引文献10

同被引文献26

  • 1王晓东,洪曼杰,郭洲,冯振华.椎弓根螺钉内固定及后路植骨融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].广东医学,2007,28(7):1080-1082. 被引量:7
  • 2邱贵兴.骨科学高级教程[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:184-189.
  • 3陈德玉,袁文,王新伟,等.腰椎伤痛诊断与治疗[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2007.107-120.
  • 4蔡国强,孔祥清,赵晓伟,吴同申,查玉梅,高峰,吴彬.后路减压椎弓根螺钉内固定椎体间自体骨植骨术治疗腰椎滑脱症疗效观察[J].济宁医学院学报,2007,30(4):311-312. 被引量:3
  • 5Nakai O, Ookaha A, Yamaum I. Long - term rentgenographic and functional changes in patient who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) , 1991,73 ( 8 ) : 1184.
  • 6Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, et al. Treatment of severe spondylo- listhesis in adolescene with reduction or fusion in situ :longtermclini- cal, radiologic and function outcome [ J ]. Spine,2006,31 ( 5 ) :583.
  • 7Brantigan JW, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, et ah erbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone. An investigational study in the Spanish goat. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ). 1994 ; 19 ( 13 ) : 1436 - 1444.
  • 8Yu CH,Wang CT, Chen PQ. Instrumented posterior lum- bar interbody fusion in adult spondylolisthesis [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2008,466(12):3034-3043.
  • 9Miasltiman AM, Ydmaz A, Cansever T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis : midterm clinical outcomes[J]. J Neuro- surg Spine, 2011,14 (4) : 488-496.
  • 10Ahsan MK, Hossain MA, Sakeb N, et al. Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)with interbody fusion device(Cage)in degenerative disc disease(DDD) :3 years outcome[J]. Mymensingh Med J, 2013,22 (4) : 798- 806.

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部