期刊文献+

饱和砂土地基三维地震响应分析 被引量:3

Three Dimension Eearthquake Response Analysis of Saturated Sand Foundation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对饱和砂土地基进行了完全耦合的三维排水有效应力动力分析。探讨了不同输入地震加速度、不同土性参数和不同土层构成等因素对饱和砂土地基抗液化性能的影响。结果表明:在地震荷载作用下,天然饱和砂土地基的水平振动加速度沿深度方向自下而上被放大;在地震中,地基中超孔压比的分布规律基本是上下部较小,中部较大;土性参数对地基本身的抗液化性能有重要影响,初始孔隙比越小,相对密度越大,土体的抗液化能力越强;随输入地震加速度的减弱,由粘土和砂土构成的地基,在不同深度处的超孔压比基本保持不变,没有出现明显的超孔压消散现象。 Saturated sand foundation is analyzed by the fully coupled three-dimension effective-stress dynamic analysis procedure. The influence of different input earthquake acceleration, soil parameter and different soil layers on anti-liquefaction nature of liquefaction foundation is discussed. The research shows that under the earthquake loading, the horizontal vibration acceleration of natural saturated sand foundation is amplified from underside to upside ; the regularities of distribution of excess pore water press ratio basically is big in intermediate foundation and small in upper and under foundation during earthquake ; the soil parameter has much influence on the anti-liquefaction nature of foundation, the littler initial void ratio, the bigger relative density, the anti-liquefaction capability of sand is more strong; with decreasing of input earthquake acceleration, the excess water pore press ratio keeps constant in different deep layer of foundation composted by clay soil and sandy soil, and the dissipation of excess pore water press is not remarkable.
出处 《工程抗震与加固改造》 2007年第5期109-113,共5页 Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(G50278003)
关键词 饱和砂土地基 动力分析 超孔隙水压力比 saturated sand foundation dynamic analysis excess pore water press ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Finn W D L, Byrne P M, Martin G R. Seismic Response and Liquefaction of Sands [ J ]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1976, 102(8): 841-856.
  • 2Seed H B, Martin P P, Lysmer J. Pore-water Pressure Changes During Soil Liqueftion [ J ]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1976, 102(4): 323-346.
  • 3徐志英,周健.奥罗维尔土坝三维排水有效应力动力分析[J].水利学报,1991,23(6):19-27. 被引量:6
  • 4Zienkiewicz O C, Leunf K H, Hinton E, Chang C T. Earth Dam Analysis for Earthquake: Numerical Solution and Constitutive Relations for Non-linear ( damage ) Analysis [A]. Proc. Int. Conf. On Dams and Earthquake [ C ], London, 1981, 179-194.
  • 5杨军,宋二祥,陈肇元.饱和土动力分析的无条件稳定交叉迭代法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2001,41(6):100-103. 被引量:6
  • 6Zienkiewicz O C, Chang C T, Bettess P. Drained, undrained, consolidating and dynamic behaviour assumpations in soils; Limits of validity[J]. Getoechnique, 1980,30:385-395.
  • 7Akiyoshi T, Fuchida K, Fang H L. Absorbing boundary conditions for dynamic analysis of fluid-saturated porous media [ J ]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1994, 13:387-397.
  • 8张艳美.碎石桩复合地基抗液化性能数值模拟及应用研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2006.
  • 9Kathiravetpillai (siva) Sivathasan. Dynamic Site Response Analysis Using Effective Stress Based Numerical Procedure [ D ]. University of California, Davis, 2002.

二级参考文献6

  • 1徐志英,地震工程与工程振动,1985年,5卷,4期
  • 2周健,地震工程与工程振动,1984年,4卷,3期
  • 3徐志英,水利学报,1983年,5期
  • 4Huang M H,Int J Numer Method Eng,1998年,43卷,1029页
  • 5Zienkiewicz O C,Int J Numer Method Eng,1988年,26卷,10391055期
  • 6Zienkiewicz O C,Int J Numer Anal Method Geomech,1978年,2卷,381页

共引文献12

同被引文献109

引证文献3

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部