期刊文献+

临床化学发光免疫法检测AFP的分析性能验证与实验方法 被引量:64

Method performance verification of the clinical chemiluminescence immunoassay
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立临床化学发光免疫检验方法学性能验证方案和实验方法。方法参考美国临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)系列文件和相关文献,结合工作实际,设计验证方案,并对 BayerCentaur 240化学发光免疫检测系统测定血清 AFP 的精密度、准确度、分析灵敏度、分析测量范围、临床可报告范围和生物参考区间6大分析性能进行验证和评价,并将实验结果与厂家(德国拜尔公司)提供的分析性能或公认的质量指标进行比较。结果 AFP 含量在77.4、168.0 ng/ml 时,日间不精密度分别为5.70%和4.84%,与厂商日间不精密度(4.9%和5.0%)基本一致;4个浓度校准品检测结果与靶值的相对偏倚均<5%,5份室间质评控制品检测结果与靶值的相对偏倚在-3.4%~11.9%之间;检测低限为1.04 ng/ml,略低于厂商的检测低限(1.30 ng/ml),生物检测限在2.65~3.53 ng/ml之间,功能灵敏度为3.53 ng/ml;分析测量范围为3.53~912.00 ng/ml(厂商线性范围1.3~1000.0ng/ml),临床可报告范围为3.53~182 400.00 ng/ml;生物参考区间验证结果为0.6~7.7 ng/ml(厂商参考区间<8.1 ng/ml)。结论 Bayer Centaur 240化学发光免疫检测系统检测 AFP 的分析性能符合临床要求,验证方案和实验方法简便易行。本研究对规范医学实验室建设和实验室认可,提高化学发光免疫检验质量有重要意义。 Objective To establish a method performance verification project and experimental method for the clinical chemiluminescence immunoassay. Methods Referring to CLSI evaluation protocols and pertinent literature, and by combining our actual works, we designed a verification procedure and experimental method. By Using these above, the precision, accuracy, analytical sensitivity, analytical measurement range, clinical reportable range and biotic interval of AFP on the Bayer Centaur 240 chemiluminescence immunoassay system were verificated. Results would be compared with the declaration of the manufacturer or desirable specifications derived from biologic variation. Results The results showed that the between-day inaccuracy on AFP levels at 77.4 ng/ml and 168.0 ng/ml was 5.70% and 4. 84% respectively ,these were consistent with manufacturer's inaccuracy claimed. The relative bias between the results measured for calibrator at four levels and target value was less 5.0%, and the relative bias between the results measured for EQA control sample at five levels and target value was - 3.4% to 11.9%. Lower limit of detection was 1.04 ng/ml, lower slightly manufacturer's analytical sensitivity claimed. Biologic limit of detection was 2. 65 ng/ml - 3.53 ng/ml, functional sensitivity was 3.53 ng/ml. Analytical measurement range was 3.53-912. 00 ng/ml, within manufacturer's liner range claimed. Clinical reportable range was 3.53-182 400. 00 ng/ml. Reference interval was 0. 6-7.7 ng/ml, within manufacturer' s claimed. Conclusions The main performances of the detection system are accorded with the declaration of the manufacturer. The performance verification procedure and experimental method of our research ars simple and practical, which has important significations for building medical laboratory and laboratory accreditation, improving quality of the chemiluminescence immunoassay.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期1293-1297,共5页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2004AA223762) 广东省医学科研基金(A2006252)
关键词 全面质量管理 实验室技术和方法 临床化学 Total quality management Laboratory techniques and procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1魏吴 丛玉隆.医学实验室质量管理与认可指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2004.72-75.
  • 2Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988 : final rule. Fed Register, 2003:3704.
  • 3毕波,吕元.定量检测方法学性能验证的系统设计[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(2):143-145. 被引量:154
  • 4CLSI. EP15-A. User demonstration of performance for precision and accuracy ,2001 : 1-15.
  • 5CLSI. EP17-A, protocols for determination of limits of detection and limits of quantitation. 2004 : 1-39.
  • 6CLSI. EP 6-A2, evaluation of the linearity of quantative analytical methods. 2003 : 1-47.
  • 7CLSI. C28-A2, how to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory. 2000 : 1-31.
  • 8秦晓光.“检查结果互认”和质量管理[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(2):132-135. 被引量:45
  • 9李金明,申子瑜.正确认识临床实验室认可与提高检验质量之间的关系[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(2):136-139. 被引量:38
  • 10CLSI. EPS-A, evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices. 1999 : 1-28.

二级参考文献28

  • 1潘柏申,张万忠,陈铭生,郭玮,周华文,倪星忠.上海地区血清丙氨酸转氨酶测定结果一致性和参考范围调查[J].检验医学,2005,20(5):417-420. 被引量:12
  • 2丛玉隆.加强检验科与临床交流促进检验科与临床结合[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(1):2-5. 被引量:117
  • 3申子瑜,李少男,王治国.我国政府对临床实验室质量保证的管理行为[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(1):6-8. 被引量:24
  • 4中国实验室国家认可委员会.中国实验室注册评审员培训教程[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2001.08..
  • 5卫生部.医疗机构临床实验室管理办法.2006-02-27.
  • 6卫生部办公厅.卫生部办公厅关于医疗机构间医学检验、医学影像检查互认有关问题的通知.2006-02-28.
  • 7国际标准化组织.ISO 9000:2000质量管理体系-理论基础和术语.2000.
  • 8Maynard JH.The regulation of medical laboratories in Australia.Clin Lab Med,1991,11:777-791.
  • 9Huisman W.European Communities Confederation of Clinical Chemistry Working Group on Accreditation:past,present and future.Clin Chim Acta,2001,309:111-114.
  • 10Haeney MR,Blair C.Raising standards in pathology:the accreditation process in the United Kingdom.J Qual Clin Pract,1998,18:75-82.

共引文献228

同被引文献381

引证文献64

二级引证文献327

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部