期刊文献+

高速与重载铁路钢轨损伤及预防技术差异研究 被引量:48

An Investigation on Difference of Rail Damage and Preventive Technique of High-speed and Heavy-haul Railway
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合多年的研究与调查,分析了高速与重载铁路钢轨损伤与预防技术的差异。钢轨侧磨与压溃是重载曲线段钢轨的主要损伤类型,而高速铁路钢轨主要表现为疲劳损伤特征;根据磨损与疲劳的相互制约与竞争关系,提出了高速与重载铁路钢轨选材及车轮型面选择的不同要求;阐述了高速与重载铁路钢轨不同曲线轨头非对称打磨技术的原理及应用。  The difference of rail damage and preventive technique on high-speed and heavy-haul railway was investigated.The results indicate that the wear of gauge-rail and the plastic flow are dominant for heavy-haul curve rail,and the fatigue behavior is primary for high-speed rail.It is suggested that the rail material and wheel profile of high-speed and heavyhaul railway is different.The different rail curve asymmetrical grinding was introduced for high-speed and heavy-haul rail.
出处 《润滑与密封》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期11-14,68,共5页 Lubrication Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50675183) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20060613017)
关键词 高速重载 钢轨损伤 磨损 疲劳 钢轨打磨 high-speed and heavy-haul rail damage wear fatigue rail grinding
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1史密斯.钢轨滚动接触疲劳的进一步研究[J].中国铁道科学,2002,23(3):6-10. 被引量:55
  • 2刘启跃,张波,周仲荣.铁路钢轨损伤机理研究[J].中国机械工程,2002,13(18):1596-1599. 被引量:47
  • 3刘启跃.钢轨的安定状态研究[J].西南交通大学学报,1995,30(4):466-471. 被引量:16
  • 4Liu Qi-yue,Jin Xue-yan,Zhu Min-hao,et al.Rail's Plastic Deformation and Shakedown Status[C].3rd International Symposium of TRIBO-FATIGUE-2000,111-114,Beijing,China,Oct 2000.
  • 5Kapoor A,Fletcher D I,Franklin.The Role of Wear in Enhancing Rail Life[J].In:D Dowson,et al (Editors),Tribology Research and Design for Engineering Systems,2003 Elsevier B V,331-340.
  • 6Kapoor,Schmid F,Fletcher D I.Managing the critical wheel/rail interface[J].Railway Gazette International,2002,158(1):25-28.
  • 7刘启跃,金雪岩.铁路车轮踏面的摩擦学设计方法[J].机械设计,1998,15(7):21-22. 被引量:2
  • 8Eric E Magel,Josepth Kalousek.The application of contact mechanics to rail profile design and rail grinding[J].Wear,2002,253:308-316.

二级参考文献15

  • 1刘启跃.钢轨的安定状态研究[J].西南交通大学学报,1995,30(4):466-471. 被引量:16
  • 2[1]Train Derailment at Hatfield[C]. 17 October 2000. Second HSE Interimreport. 23 January 2001. http://www.hse.gov.uk/railway/hatfield.interim2.htm.
  • 3[2]Ian Jack.The Crash That Stopped Britain[M]. Granta Books, London, 2001.
  • 4[3]Freeman R, Shaw J,eds. All Change: British Railways Privatisation[M]. McGraw-Hill, London, 2000.
  • 5[4]Smith R A.The Versailles Railway Accident of 1842 and the Beginnings of the MetalFatigue Problem [C].In Proceedings Fatigue 90, The FourthInternational Conference on Fatigue and Fatigue Thresholds, Hawaii,15-20 July 1990.
  • 6[5]Eds H Kitagawa, T Tanaka. Materials and Component [M].Publications Ltd. Birmingham,1990,4:2033-2041.
  • 7[6]S Suresh.Fatigue of Materials[M],Cambridge University Press, 2 nd Ed,1998.
  • 8[7]Kapoor A.Wear Fatigue Interactions and Maintenance Strategies[C]. In Why Failures Occur in the Wheel Rail Systems, Proceedings of an Advanced Railway Research Centre Seminar, Derby, 22 May 2001.
  • 9苏辉艳.减轻重载列车轮轨磨耗的研究.中国铁路,1997,(6):42-43.
  • 10刘启跃.减缓曲线钢轨侧磨的方法探讨[J].铁道建筑,1997,37(5):28-30. 被引量:13

共引文献110

同被引文献394

引证文献48

二级引证文献277

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部