摘要
现行刑法没有限定交通肇事罪的主体,由此产生许多争议,其中包括行人是否能够构成交通肇事罪的问题。认真分析关于交通肇事罪的立法表述的细微变化,会发现理论界将行人纳入交通肇事罪的主体违背立法原意,无论是从外国立法考察,还是从法哲学进行分析,行人都不是交通肇事罪的主体。
The current criminal law has not defined the subject of traffic accident crime,which results in lots of disputes,including the dispute that whether pedestrian can be the subject of traffic accident crime. By carefully analyzing the slight changes of legislation of the traffic accident crime, we find that circles of theory bringing pedestrian into the subject of traffic accident crime violates the original intention of legislation. Pedestran is not the subject of traffic accident crime based on observing and studying foreign legislation as well as analyzing the philosophy of law.
出处
《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》
2007年第5期52-55,共4页
Journal of Huan Public Security College
关键词
行人
交通肇事罪
外国立法
法哲学
pedestrian
traffic accident crime
legislations of foreign countries
philosophy of law
