期刊文献+

瑞替普酶和重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的临床研究 被引量:10

Clinnical study of reteplase and alteplase as thrombolytics in treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对比观察瑞替普酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)用于急性心肌梗死(AMI)静脉溶栓治疗的效果及安全性。方法将122例发病12h内的AMI患者随机分为两组,瑞替普酶组60例,瑞替普酶20mU间隔30min分2次静脉推注;rt-PA组62例,rt-PA8mg静脉推注,42mg,90min内静脉滴注。观察两组溶栓再通率、急性期病死率、心肌梗死并发症和不良事件发生率。结果溶栓后30、60、90和120min瑞替普酶组临床判断再通率均高于rt-PA组,两组60和90min2个时间段比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。90min瑞替普酶组48例行冠状动脉造影,42例显示梗死相关血管再通为87.5%,rt-PA组42例行冠状动脉造影,29例显示梗死相关血管再通为69.05%(P<0.01);35天瑞替普酶组死亡2例(3.33%),rt-PA组死亡3例(4.84%);两组均无脑出血病史;不良事件发生率瑞替普酶组为23.3%,rt-PA组为25.6%。结论瑞替普酶静脉溶栓治疗AMI比较安全,较rt-PA能更早地使梗死相关血管开通,并有较高的血管开通率及较低的急性期病死率。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolylic therapy using reteplase and aheplase (rt-PA) in acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients with AMI during April 2005 to September 2006 were randomized to receive either reteplase or rt-PA. Reteplase was administered as 2 intravenous bolus injections of 10 mU 30 minutes apart;rt-PA was administered as an intravenous infusion of 50 mg in 90 min,including an initial 8 mg bolus. The infarct-related coronary artery recanalization rate, fatality rate in acute stage, incidence of complications and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. Results The recamalization rate by clinical judgment at 30,60,90 and 120 min was higher in reteplase group than in rt-PA group,with statistically zignificant difference at 60 and 90 min between the two groups ( P 〈0. 01, P〈0. 05) ; The recanalization rate by angiography (TIMI grade 2 and 3 flow) was also higher in reteplase group than in rt-PA group(87.50% ws 69.05%, P 〈0. 001). The fatality rate in 35 days was 3.33% in reteplase group and 4.84% in rt-PA group( P〉0.05). The rate of intracranial hemorrhage was zero in both groups. The rate of adverse events was 23.3% in reteplase group and 25.6% in rt-PA group. Conclusion Reteplase is an effective,reliable and safe thrombolytic agent in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. The time of angio-recanalization is earlier with reteplase treatment than with alteplase.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第11期733-735,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 心肌梗塞 组织型纤溶酶原激活物 血栓溶解疗法 治疗 临床研究性 myocardial infarction tissue plasminogen activator thrombolytic therapy therapy, investigational
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1胡大一.心血管疾病防治中国专家共泌[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.156-166.
  • 2David A.Morrow MD,Elliott M. et al. Evaluation of the time saved by prehospital initiation of reteplase for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Results of the Early Retavase Thrombol ysis In Myocardial Infarction (ER TIMI) 19 Tria[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol.2002,40:71-77.
  • 3Bode C,Smalling RW,Berg G, et al . Randomized comaparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double bolus reteplase ( recombinant plasminogen activator ) and frontloaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 1996, 94:891-898.
  • 4瑞替普酶(派通欣)Ⅱ期临床试验协作组.注射用瑞替普酶(派通欣)治疗急性心肌梗死有效性及安全性临床研究[J].中国心血管病研究,2004,2(3):171-174. 被引量:137
  • 5史旭波,胡大一,李田昌.常规剂量瑞替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死安全性分析[J].临床荟萃,2005,20(20):1141-1144. 被引量:39
  • 6陈树涛,王林,李广平,丛洪良,张梅,徐延敏,王伟,张承宗,黄体钢.注射用重组瑞替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效评价[J].中国心血管杂志,2005,10(5):363-365. 被引量:15
  • 7田宝石,董士民,李侠,张新颜.注射用瑞替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死72例临床分析[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(8):640-641. 被引量:23
  • 8La Scala E,Steffenino G,Dellavalle A. Half dose thrombolysis to begin with , when immediate coronary angioplasty in acute myocardialinfarction is not possible[J]. Ital Heart J,2004,5: 678-683.
  • 9Zeymer U, Schroder R, Machnig T. Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty accelerates early myocardial reperfusion compared to thromlaolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am Heart J,2003.146:686-691.

二级参考文献16

  • 1胡大一.急性心肌梗塞链激酶静脉溶栓疗法的多中心试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,1994,22(6):403-405. 被引量:60
  • 2ResearchGroupofNationalProject85-915-02-01(Correspondence:FuWaiHospi-tal,CAMS&PUMC,Beijing100037).急性心肌梗塞尿激酶临床应用研究(1138例)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(3):169-173. 被引量:156
  • 3LLEVADOT J,GIUGLIANO R P,ANTMAN E M.Bolus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction[J].JAMA,2001,286(4):442-449.
  • 4MENON V,HARRINGTON R A,HOCHMAN J S,et al.Thrombolysis and adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy[J].Chest,2004,126(3 suppl):549S-575S.
  • 5WEAVER W D.Results of the RAPID-1 and RAPID-2 thrombolytic trials in acute myocardial infarction[J].Eur Heart J,1996,17(suppl E):14-20.
  • 6ANTMAN E M,ANBE D T,ARMSTRONG P W,et al.ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J].Circulation,2004,110(5):588-636.
  • 7GUSTO-Ⅲ Investigators.An international,multicenter,randomized comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,1997,337(16):1118-1123.
  • 8GUSTO III Investigators. An international, multicenter, randomized cornpareison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 1997,337:1118-1123.
  • 9International Joint Efficacy Comparsion of Thrombolytics. Randomised, double-blind compareison of the reteplase doublebolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction(INJECT) : trial to investingate equivalence[J]. Lancet, 1995, 346: 329-336.
  • 10La Scala E, Steffenino G, Dellavalle A. Half-dose thrombolysis to begin with, when immediate coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction is not possible[J]. Ital Heart J,2004 ,5:678-683.

共引文献174

同被引文献114

引证文献10

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部