摘要
目的比较低温等离子、微波、激光、鼻孔填塞等4种治疗方法对鼻出血的疗效。方法将113例鼻出血患者随机分为4组，分别采用低温等离子（n=37）、微波（n=28）、激光（n=26）和鼻腔填塞（n=18）治疗，对比分析其疗效。结果低温等离子总有效率为97．4％，微波法为96．4％，激光法为92．3％，鼻腔填塞法为95％，4组疗效比较无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。但术中低温等离子法出血率低于微波法及激光法（P〈0．05）。结论4种治疗方法疗效相近，但低温等离子法疗效简单易行，出血率较小，值得临床推广。
objective To investige the difference of the curative effect in treating severe epistaxis among coblation ,microwave, laser and tamponade therapy. Method 113 patients with severe epistaxis of little area were treated by coblation（n=37）,microwave （n=28）,laser（n=26） and tamponade therapy（n=18） respectively. Result There was no significant difference among four therapies（coblation：97.4% ,microwave： 96.4%,laser： 92.3% and tamponade： 95%,P〉0.05）. Bleeding rate with coblation is significant lower than that with microwave and laser therapy （P〈0. 05）.Conclusion The effect is similar among four therapies in treating severe epistaxis. But coblation therapy is simply and clinically important for epistaxis.
出处
《国际医药卫生导报》
2007年第21期26-28,共3页
International Medicine and Health Guidance News
