摘要
对148例同期入院小儿重症肺炎，随机抽样分组，施行两种氧疗方法。设组合药液组75例，在氧气湿化瓶中加入抗菌、消炎、化痰、解痉、平喘药物湿化给氧，并与73例传统式单纯蒸馏水湿化给氧组对照比较，结果表明：两组吸氧次数、时间、有效时间差异有极显著性（P＜0.001）；血氧饱和度改变值及两组疗效对比差异有显著性（P＜0.05，P＜0．005）；组合药液总有效率94．66％，单纯蒸馏水组73．97％;两组住院时间及治疗费用比较差异亦有显著性（P＜0．01，P＜0．05）。研究认为组合药液湿化给氧疗法方法简便，疗效确切。
148 cases of critical pneumonia at the same period xvere divided into two groups randomly andsupplied by two oxygen therapeutic methods. The study group has 75 cases, whom were given aerosolizedoxygen with antibacterial, antiphlogistic drugs, expectorants, antisIJastic and antiasthmatic drugs, and comparedwith 73 cases of convenient simple with aerosoized oxygen inhalation. The results showed the frequency, timeand starting effect time of inhaling oxygen in two groups have significant difference (P < 0. 001) and thealteration of SaO2 and the therapeutic effect in two groups also have significant difference (P <0. 05, P < 0.005 respectively) The total effectual rates of the study and control group were 94. 66% and 73. 94%respectively.The difference between the duration of hospitalization and the therapeutic expenditure in twogroups were significance (P <0. 01, P < 0. 05 respectvely). The study indicated that aerosolized oxygencombined drug liquid is a better oxygen therapy method for treating pneumonia.
出处
《中华护理杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
1997年第6期316-319,共4页
Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金
山东省滕州市中心人民医院科研基金
