期刊文献+

扩散张量成像图像数据采集技术的参数优化 被引量:2

Parameters Optimization of Data Acquisition Techniques in Diffusion Tensor Imaging
暂未订购
导出
摘要 为优化扩散张量成像图像采集技术,在1.5 T磁共振扫描仪上,使用3种具有不同扩散编码梯度方向数目(NDGD)的序列成像,采用基于感兴趣区和体素的2种方法,在6个部位比较3个序列的扩散系数(〈D〉)、各向异性分数(FA)和扩散张量的本征值.另外,采用具有不同扩散敏感因子b值的序列成像,测量并探讨b值与图像信噪比和表观扩散系数的关系.结果表明,在感兴趣区水平,所有序列的〈D〉和FA及其标准差没有统计学区别,但张量本征值却有差异.在体素水平,在多数部位21-NDGD和31-NDGD序列的相关系数较高.随着b值增高,信噪比降低.当b值在一定范围内时,表观扩散系数及其标准差有不同的变化.实际中应根据不同的应用(感兴趣区或体素分析以及扩散张量成像测量参数的不同)来选择NDGD,选用b值介于400~1 300 s/mm2较为合适. To study and optimize diffusion tensor imaging ( DTI )acquisition techniques,in a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner, single-shot DTI images were acquired by using three protocols with different numbers of diffusion-encoding gradient directions( NDGD ). DTI indices, including diffusivity (〈D〉), fractional anisotropy ( FA ) and diffusion tensor eigenvalues, were calculated and compared with regions of interest ( ROI ) level and voxel-level methods for three protocols in six locations. In addition, DTI images were acquired with different diffusion sensitized factors b. The relationships between signal-to-noise ratio, apparent diffusion coefficient and b were analyzed. At the ROI level, no significant differences were found for 〈D〉 and FA among protocols, however, not for eigenvalues. At the voxel level, the correlation coefficient between 21-NDGD and 31-NDGD protocols was higher in most locations. Signal-to-noise ratio reduced with increased b. Apparent diffusion coefficient and its standard deviation had different change in a certain range of b. It is concluded that the selection of NDGD should depend on the different diffusion tensor imaging applications to ROI or voxel-level analyses and different diffusion tensor imaging indices, and b in the range of 400-1 300 s/mm^2 is better.
出处 《天津大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第9期1120-1127,共8页 Journal of Tianjin University(Science and Technology)
关键词 磁共振成像 扩散张量成像 采集技术 扩散编码梯度方向数目 扩散敏感因子 magnetic resonance imaging diffusion tensor imaging acquisition technique number of diffusionencoding gradient direction diffusion sensitized factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Basser P J,Mattiello J K,Bihan D.Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo[ J ].J Magn Reson,1994,B 103:247-254.
  • 2Chepuri N B,Yen Y F,Burdette J H.Diffusion anisotropy in the corpus callosum[ J ].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2002,23,803-808.
  • 3Fellgiebel A,Wille P,Muller M J,et al.Ultrastructural hippocampal and white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment:A diffusion tensor imaging study[ J ].Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2004,18:101-108.
  • 4陆菁菁,王含,冯逢,付海鸿,金征宇,崔丽英.磁共振扩散张量成像用于多系统萎缩患者黑质纹状体投射的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(7):990-993. 被引量:11
  • 5Zhong J,Ni H,Zhu T.MR diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neuropsychological testing for neuronal connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease (AD)Patients[ C ]//Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging.San Diego,2004,5369:238-249
  • 6Skare S,Hedehus M,Moseley M E,et al.Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI[J].J Magn Reson,2000,147:340-352.
  • 7Hasan K M,Parker D L,Alexander A L.Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI[ J ].J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13:769-780.
  • 8Papadakis N G,Murrills C D,Hall L D,et al.Minimal gradient encoding for robust estimation of diffusion anisotropy[ J ].Magn Reson Imaging,2000,18:671-679.
  • 9Jones D K.The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI:A monte carlo study[J].Magn Reson Med,2004,51:807-815.
  • 10Kingsley P B,Monahan W G.Selection of the optimum b factor for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ischemic stroke[ J ].Magn Reson Med,2004,51:996-1001.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Wenning GK,Tison F,Ben-Shlomo Y,et al.Multiple system atrophy:a review of 203 pathologically proven cases[J].Mov Disord,1997,12(2):133-147.
  • 2Gilman S,Low DA,Quinn N,et al.Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy[J].J Neurol Sci,1999,163(1):94-98.
  • 3Schrag A,Kingsley D,Phatouros C,et al.Clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in multiple system atrophy[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1998,65(1):65-71.
  • 4Bhattacharya K,Saadia D,Eisenkraft B,et al.Brain magnetic resonance imaging in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson disease:a diagnostic algorithm[J].Arch Neurol,2002,59(5):835-842.
  • 5Stieltjes B,Kaufmann WE,van Zijl PCM,et al.Diffusion tensor imaging and axonal tracking in the human brainstem[J].NeuroImage,2001,14(3):723-735.
  • 6Yamada K,Kizu O,Mori S,et al.Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion tensor imaging:initial experience[J].Radiology,2003,227(4):295-301.
  • 7Kume A,Takahashi A,Hashizume Y.Neuronal cell loss of the striatonigral system in multiple system atrophy[J].J Neurol Sci,1993,117(1):33-40.
  • 8Yoshikawa K,Nakata Y,Yamada K,et al.Early pathological changes in the parkinsonian brain demonstrated by diffusion tensor MRI[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2004,75(3):481-484.
  • 9Siemers ER.Multiple system atrophy[J].Med Clin North Am,1999,83:381-392.
  • 10Seppi K,Schocke MF,Mair KJ,et al.Progression of putaminal degeneration in multiple system atrophy:A serial diffusion MR study[J].NeuroImage,2006 Jan 26;[Epub ahead of print]

共引文献10

同被引文献18

  • 1钟镜联,谭湘萍,梁碧玲,云文娟,黄穗齐,叶瑞心.不同b值在正常人脑组织磁共振扩散张量成像中的应用探讨[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2004,13(3):148-152. 被引量:9
  • 2张敬,郭慧,张云亭.颅内肿瘤DTI及DTT应用价值初探[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(3):197-201. 被引量:12
  • 3邹立秋,张芳,屈辉,李大胜,张媛,谢敬霞.不同数量梯度磁场方向对正常脑白质纤维束扩散张量成像的比较定量研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(10):906-909. 被引量:4
  • 4钟维佳,赵建农,谢微波,邢海芳,陈维娟.磁共振扩散张量成像对正常人脑结构的显示及各向异性研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2006,25(9):807-810. 被引量:3
  • 5Essig M, Giesel F, Stieltjes B, et al. Functional imaging for brain tumors (perfusion, DTI and MR spectroscopy). Radiology, 2007,47(6) :513-519.
  • 6Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, et al. Intraoperative dif fusion terlsor MR imaging: shifting of white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures--initial experience. Radiology, 2005,234(]):218-225.
  • 7Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of dif fusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med, 1996,36(6) :893-906.
  • 8Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm man- agement and stroke prevention: the An Ticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial FibrillationfATRIA)Study, JAMA, 2001,285 (18):2370 2375.
  • 9Berners ME, Rutka JJ, Rosenblum ML. Brain tumors epidermi ology growth and invasion. Neurosury Clin North Am, 1990, 1 (1):1-18.
  • 10Lam WW, Poon WS , Metreweli C. Diffusion MR imaging in gli- oma: does it have any role in the pre operation determination of grading of gliomas'? Clin Radiol, 2002,57(3):219 225.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部