期刊文献+

氯硝西泮、氟哌啶醇及其联合治疗对精神分裂症激越症状疗效的比较 被引量:5

Safety and efficacy of clona{epam, haloperidol and haloperidol combined with clonazepam in the treatment of schizophrenia with excitement and agitation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较氯硝西泮、氟哌啶醇及其联合治疗对精神分裂症激越症状的疗效及安全性。方法本研究为随机、双盲、双模拟、平行活性对照研究,共分3组。氯硝西泮组15例,剂量范围(2-6)mg/d;氟哌啶醇组15例,剂量范围(5-15)mg/d;氟哌啶醇+氯硝西泮组15例,氯硝西泮剂量范围(2-6)mg/d,氟哌啶醇剂量范围(5-15)mg/d。3组均以简明精神症状评定量表(BPRS)总分、BPRS兴奋激越项目分数、BPRS阳性症状项目分数及按临床疗效总评量表(CGI)标准评定观察24小时。结果3组的总体疗效大致相当,24h治疗后BPRS兴奋激越项目评分与基线分比较均具显著性差异(P〈0.01),但各组之间无显著性差异(P〉0.05);BPRS阳性症状项目评分与基线分比较均无显著性差异(P〉0.05),各组之间也无显著性差异。结论氯硝西泮肌注对精神分裂症兴奋激越症状的疗效与氟哌啶醇或氟哌啶醇加氯硝西泮相当。 Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of clonazepam, haloperidol and haloperidol combined with clonazepam in the treatment of the acute phase schizophrenia. Methods: 15 cases were treated with clonazepam with the dose of (2-6)mg/d,15 cases were treated with haloperidol at the dose of (5-15 ) mg/d , 15 cases were treated with clonazepam ( 2-6 ) mg/d and haloperidol ( 5 - 15 ) mg/d. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression(CGI) were used to measure the efficacy and safety for 24 hours. Results: The efficacy of three groups in treating the acute phase schizophrenia was similar. Acute agitation in schizophrenia was significantly alleviated in each group( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions:Clonazepam was as efficacious as haloperidol and clonazepam combined with haloperidol in controlling excitement and agitation in schizophrenia patients.
出处 《上海精神医学》 2007年第3期150-152,共3页 Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry
基金 美国John M Davis基金
关键词 氯硝西泮 氟哌啶醇 精神分裂症 急性激越 Clonazepam Haloperidol Schizophrenia Acute agitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献11

  • 1[6]Marder S. Pharmacological treatment strategies in acute schizophrenia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 1996, 11(suppl 2) : 29~34
  • 2[7]Bailine S, Lesser M, Krubit G, et al. Comparison of IM haloperidol and IM chlorpromazine in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients.Psychiatr Hosp, 1987, 18: 127~129
  • 3于欣,侯也之,舒良,王秀玲,李冰,刘卫红,林凯,杨顺才,宋丽华,廖安燕,谢家康,贾宏晓,张继志.利培酮治疗精神分裂症的开放性临床验证[J].中华精神科杂志,1997,30(2):79-82. 被引量:330
  • 4张聪沛,张延承,王琳,王莹,滕秀英,王怀政.维思通与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症对照分析[J].临床精神医学杂志,1997,7(2):74-75. 被引量:47
  • 5Wirshing DA, Marshall BD, et al. Risperidone in treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 1999, 156 : 1374
  • 6Kern RS, Green MF, et al. Risperidone vs. haloperidol on reaction time, manual dextrity and motor learning in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry, 1998, 44: 726
  • 7Iskedjian M, Hux M, et al. The canadian experience with resperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia: an overview. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 1998, 23 : 229
  • 8Kinon BJ. The routine use of atypical antipsychotic agents: maintenance treatment. J Clin Psychiatry, 1998, 19: 18
  • 9翁茵茵,张心保,陈进,喻东山.利培酮与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症的对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,1998,8(2):83-85. 被引量:28
  • 10赵靖平,陈晓刚,陈远光.维思通治疗精神分裂症疗效与PANSS应用的初步研究[J].四川精神卫生,1998,11(1):1-3. 被引量:12

共引文献19

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部