摘要
目的比较一次性根充法和传统的分次根充法在治疗外伤性露髓牙中的长期疗效。方法选择135例病人共计182颗符合行根管治疗术指征的外伤性露髓患牙,随机分为两组,分别应用一次性根充法与传统的分次根充法进行治疗,2年后观察其远期疗效。结果经统计学处理和分析,前牙及后牙的治疗成功率二项比较,一次性根充法和传统的分次根充法的差异均无显著性。结论对外伤性露髓患牙进行的根管治疗术应用一次法与多次法在长期疗效上并无显著差异,但从方便患者就诊、减少治疗费用、减轻医生工作强度、简化治疗过程的角度来看,应尽量使用一次法。
Objective To compare the long-term treatment effects of root canal filling once and traditional root canal filling in separate times when injury caused dental pulp exposure.Methods A total of 135 patients were selected, 182 teeth were exposed dental pulp due to injury, they were suitable for using root canal therapy and were divided randomly into test group and control group, root canal filling once and traditional root canal filling in separate times was applied respectively. The long-term treatment effects were investigated 2 years later.Results The statistical results were as follows： through a comparison of the cure rate of both anterior teeth and posterior teeth, root canal filling once and traditional root canal filling in separate times had no significant difference.Conclusion There＇s no significant difference of the long-term treatment effects between root canal treatment once and several times after dental pulp exposure. However, in terms of being convenient for patients, cutting down medical fee, decreasing doctors＇ working, simplifying treating process, root canal filling once should be applied better.
出处
《现代口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第4期376-377,共2页
Journal of Modern Stomatology
关键词
外伤性露髓牙
一次性根充
根管治疗术
Injury-caused dental pulp exposure Root canal filling in one time Root canal therapy
