期刊文献+

曲马朵与布桂嗪对胸外科患者术后疼痛镇痛效果的比较

Comparison of Tramadol and Bucinnazine for Analgesia after Thoracic Operation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较曲马朵与布桂嗪的镇痛疗效及安全性,为临床用药提供参考。方法选择胸科手术患者256例,将其随机分为甲组(曲马朵组)和乙组(布桂嗪组),观察两组的疗效、起效时间及持续时间。结果曲马朵组完全缓解32例(25%),显效96例(75%),总有效率100%;布桂嗪组完全缓解38例(29.7%),显效90例(70.3%),总有效率100%。结论两组的总有效率均为100%,组间比较无统计学意义。 Objective To compare the effect and safety of tramadol and bucinnazine for analgesia and to provide the referrence for drug use in clinic. Methods 256 cases who underwent thoracic surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group A was treated with tramadol, and group B with bucinnazine. The effectiveness, functioning timing and continuous time were observed. Results With tramadol, 32 cases (25%) were completely alliviated and 96 (75%) partly alliviated. However, 38 cases (29.7%) were completely alliviated and 90 (70. 3% ) partly alliviated with bucinnazine. Conclusion The effectiveness in both groups were 100%. The difference between two groups was not significant.
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2007年第7期48-49,共2页 China Pharmaceuticals
关键词 曲马朵 布桂嗪 镇痛 疗效观察 tramadol bucinnazine analgesia observation of therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1Dayer P,Collart L,Desmeules J. The pharmacology of tramadol .Drugs, 1994,47(1) :3
  • 2James MF, Heijke SA, Gordon PC. Intravenous tramadol versus, epidural morphine for postthoracotomy pain relief: a placebo- controlled doubleblind trial. Anesth analg, 1996; 83: 87
  • 3Lintz W et al. Drug Research . 1986
  • 4Lintz W et al. Arzneimittelfors . 1981
  • 5Hennies HH et al. Drugs Res . 1998
  • 6Sevick J et al. British Journal of Pharmacology . 1993
  • 7Raffa RB et al. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics . 1992
  • 8Lee CR et al. Drugs . 1993
  • 9Bamibade TA et al. Pain Reviews . 1998
  • 10Driessen B et al. British Journal of Pharmacology . 1993

共引文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部