摘要
森岛通夫运用马尔科夫过程,通过对投入产出的逐次迭代,论述从价值到生产价格的转化。由于他不是根据马克思的经济理论来选择必需的数学工具,而是企图从数学工具运用的需要出发来诠释经济理论,以至于不加分析地盲目运用西方经济学的投入产出分析和一般均衡方法,看不到投入品价值的"转形"和产出品价值的"转形"在考察期内已经具有不同的性质。这样做的结果,必然将价值增殖过程和价值的转形过程割裂开来,将再生产过程中平均利润形成的时间和生产价格的形成时间人为地割裂开来。森岛通夫将非负矩阵的弗洛本涅斯定理和马尔科夫链理论用错了地方,不仅没有成功地解决转形问题,而且使转形问题的研究误入了歧途,因而对马克思劳动价值论的坚持和发展帮了倒忙。
This paper reviews Michio Morishima's solution to the transformation problem,taking the simple and extended models of Marx's value transformation as a reference framework.Using a Markov process,Morishima discusses the transformation from value to production price by means of successive input-output iterations.However,instead of selecting the necessary mathematical tools in accordance with Marxist economic theories,he tries to start from the application of mathematical tools in interpreting economic theories.Together with his indiscriminate As he indiseriminately uses the input-output analysis and general equilibrium method of Western economics,this means that he fails to see that the value transformation of input and that of output respectively already possess different natures during the observation period.This necessarily results in separating the process of producing surplus value from the process of value transformation and artificially separating the time needed for the formation of average profit in the process of reproduction from the time needed for the formation of production prices.Morishima's fallacious use of the Frobenius Theorem and the Markov Chain has not only failed to solve the transformation problem,but has led research on the subject into false paths,retarding rather than advancing the cause of upholding and developing Marxist labor value theory.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第6期66-80,共15页
Social Sciences in China
