摘要
起诉制约裁判,是现代不告不理原则的基本体现。在起诉方式上,英美法系采用诉因制度,大陆法系采取公诉事实制度,两种起诉方式在公诉效力方面存有差异,尤其体现在法官变更罪名之裁判权方面。两大法系起诉方式与公诉效力的差异主要源于诉讼理念以及诉讼制度的不同。我国在公诉效力问题上尚缺乏明确立法规定,实践中法院越权裁判时有发生,确立公诉效力原则很有必要。
Prosecution restricts judgement, which embodies the principle of ‘no trial without complaint＇. There are two prosecutorial modes： common law system used in count institution and civil law used in public prosecutorial facts, there exist some differences between the two, which resulted from their dissimilar litigant idea and mechanism.There isn＇t an unambiguous rule of public prosecutorial force in China, so it is necessary to establish it.
出处
《青岛科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第3期83-87,共5页
Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
诉因
公诉事实
公诉效力
评析
count
prosecutorial facts
prosecutorial force
analysis
