期刊文献+

“土耳其人阻断商路”说与西方的近东殖民 被引量:12

"The Turkish Blockade of Trade Routes" and Western Colonization in the Middle East
原文传递
导出
摘要 因传统商路被阻西欧人才寻求新航路的观点至今流行。但当时奥斯曼帝国正在崛起,葡萄牙人也尝试探险;葡萄牙人到达印度时,土耳其人尚未控制东地中海的埃及和叙利亚。葡萄牙人在西非的成功掠夺助长了贪欲,他们不愿通过正常商业手段而是通过掠夺获取财富,因此有意避开意大利人和阿拉伯人保持的地中海贸易秩序。"土耳其人阻断商路"之说源于西欧人对"土耳其威胁"的夸大和对穆斯林的敌意,舆论制造者是后来的欧洲殖民者而非早期的殖民者。 It remains a commonly accepted view that Europeans explored new trade routes only after the Turks blockaded the old ones. However, the Ottoman Empire was still rising when the Portuguese ventured forth. At the time when the Portuguese reached India, the Turks did not yet have a firm grip on the eastern Mediterranean, Egypt and Syria. After successfully pillaging West Africa, the Portuguese became unwilling to seek wealth through normal commercial dealings rather than plunder, so deliberately avoided the trade set-up maintained in the Mediterranean by the Italians and the Arabs. The argument that the Turks blockaded the trade routes is based on an exaggeration of 'the Turkish threat' and hostility toward Muslims. In this respect, the makers of public opinion were the later rather than the earlier European colonizers. The actions of the former in the Near East have exposed their earlier ambitions.
作者 王三义
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期162-170,共9页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Carlo M. Cipolla, Gun, Sails, & Empires : Technological Innovation and the Early Phases of European Expansion, 1400-1700, New York: Pantheon Books, 1965.
  • 2Edward Potts Cheyney, European Background of American History, 1300-1600, New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co. , 1966.
  • 3Carton J. Hayes, Parker Thomas Moon & John W. Wayland, World History, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1934.
  • 4James Edward Gillespie, A History of Modern Europe, 1500-1815, New York, 1939.
  • 5德加兹·加亚尔等.《欧洲史》,蔡鸿宾等译,海口:海南出版社,2000年
  • 6吴于廑,齐世荣.《世界史·近代史编》上卷,北京:高等教育出版社,2000年
  • 7A. H. Lybyer, "The Ottoman Turks and the Routes of Oriental Trade," The English Historical Review, CXX, 1915, p. 588.
  • 8伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦.《现代世界体系》第1卷.尤来寅,等译.高等教育出版社,1998年,第460—473页.
  • 9刘桂生.《认识“世界史”中的西方话语霸权,坚持文化思想上的民族主体性-在雷海宗先生世界史课上所受到的教益》,载南开大学历史学院编.《雷海宗与二十世纪中国史学》,北京:中华书局,2005年,第69-75页
  • 10《伯伦史学集》.北京:中华书局,2002年,第614页.

共引文献13

同被引文献132

引证文献12

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部