摘要
拉康哲学以悲观极端的方式从反面证明了马克思的人的本质是社会关系总和的论断。但他的理论忽视了实践机制对人意识形成的建构作用,没有对他者的来源和本质作出合理解释;由于其理论辩证性的缺失,将意识的建构单向绝对化,导致其理论座架没能走出主客二分的近代哲学构架,并隐含有价值悬设。事实上个体意识对人类文化的继承和发展的关系,是“小我”和“大我”在社会历史场域中的实践关系。
The philosophy of Lacan proved Marx＇s judgement that human nature is the sum of social relationship. However, Lacan＇s theory neglected the constructional function of practice mechanism to human consciousness, and gave no reasonal explanation to the source and nature Other. Because of the loss of dialectics, his theory hasn＇t surpassed the philosophical structure of Subject and Object.
出处
《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第2期151-154,共4页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
镜像
他者
实践
社会关系
辩证性
mirror image
other
practice
social relationship
dialectics
