期刊文献+

饲养动物致害责任探析 被引量:14

Analysis on Liability for Tort of Domesticated Animals
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 动物致害责任的立法历史悠久,我国现行关于动物致害责任的民事立法规定太过原则与笼统,缺乏可操作性,难以形成利于受害人权利保护的合理的民事救济体系。未来民法典应区分不同的动物种类,适用不同的归责原则,并预设各类动物侵权类型的责任承担。 The legislation on liability for tort of domesticated animals is centuriesold. The existing civil legal provision on liability for tort of animals is too general to be maneuverable. As a result, it' s difficult to form a reasonable civil remedies system in favor of protection of the victim' s right. The civil code in the future should stipulate different doctrine of liability fLxation based upon various animals, and preestablish some new types of tort of animals, such as land incursion of livestock, preservation measures of internment or sell of the inflictable animals, the proceedings of disruption from animals and so on.
作者 潘志玉
机构地区 山东政法学院
出处 《政法论丛》 2007年第4期65-68,共4页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 饲养动物 归责原则 免责事由 过错 domesticated animals doctrine of liability fixation excuse for nonresponsibility error
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1][加]Phlip@ H@ Osborne. The Law Of Torts[M]. Irwin Law. Tomto,2000,309.
  • 2[2][6][美]William. Animal Law in California [ J ]. Pepperdine Law Re-view. Vol, 12,1985,596.
  • 3[3][7][8][9][10]参见[英]The Animals Act 1971.s6(2),s5(2),s6(5),s5(30).
  • 4[4][澳]John G@Fleming.The Law Of torts[M].400.
  • 5[5][英]W@V@H@Rogers. Winfield And Jolowicz On Ton[M]. 15th Edition,Sween & Maxwell. London, 1998,574,575.
  • 6[11][英]W@ V@ H. Rogers. Winfield And Jolowicz On Tort [ M ]. 577.
  • 7[12][13][16][加]Phlip@ H@Oshorne. The Law Of Tons[M]. 312. 314
  • 8[14][15][17][19][参见][英]The Animals Act 1971 ,s4(1),s5(1),s5(6),s5(5).
  • 9[18]参见[美]Marsha@K@Ternus.Liability For The Escape Of Animals,Drake Law Review[J].1981,Vol.30,No.20,p266.
  • 10[20]参见(1882)10 QB,p17-20.

共引文献20

同被引文献76

引证文献14

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部