摘要
20世纪60年代的“文革”时期,国内最盛行的解读西方音乐作品的方法,是所谓“阶级分析”的方法,它被视为所谓的“马克思主义历史唯物主义”而被推崇备至。那时候,许多人把简单的“阶级分析”当作“马克思主义”,轻易地把西方的音乐作品通通“批倒、批臭。”“文革”初期红卫兵的“大字报”式的批判毫无音乐分析可言;官方喉舌“初澜”的文章完全抛开艺术,着力进行政治上的批判;从事西方音乐教学与研究工作的学者在禁锢中进行了一些思考。今天,客观地、理智地审视“阶级分析”的方法,总结教训,警示后人,是有意义的事情。
The Great Cultural Revolution in 1960s, it was very popular to deal with West music with a way named class-analyse, which regard as the historical materialism of Marxism. A lot of persons looked the simple class-analyse as the Marxism, repudiated all of the West music works ad arbitrium. The article listed three aspects： the big-character posters repudiation by Red guard in the early stages of the Great Cultural Revolution, the articles by Chulan, stand for the official vioce, and the thinkings of the scholars undertoke the West music teaching and researching in thoughts durance periods. The writers pointed out the necessity to resummarize the historical lessons impersonality and intellectly at present.
出处
《黄钟（武汉音乐学院学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第3期69-79,共11页
Huangzhong:Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music
关键词
文化大革命
阶级分析
西方音乐作品
the Great Cultural Revolution, class-analyse, West music work
