摘要
目的和方法采用温针灸配合水针治疗手腕部腱鞘炎80例,并与针刺治疗28例及温针治疗30例进行比较。结果温针灸配合水针治疗治愈率为81.2%,总有效率为100%;针刺治疗分别为32.1%、78.6%;温针治疗分别为33.3%、80.0%。温针灸配合水针治疗与针刺治疗、温针治疗分别比较,差异均有统计学意义,均P<0.01,前者疗效明显优于后者。结论温针灸配合水针治疗手腕部腱鞘炎疗效较好。
Objective and Methods Eighty patients with wrist tenosynovitis were treated by wanning acupuncture plus point injection. For comparison, 28 patients were treated by acupuncture and 30 patients, by wanning acupuncture. Results The cure rate and total efficacy rate were 81.2% and 100%, respectively, for wanning acupuncture plus point injection, 32.1% and 78.6%, respectively, for acupuncture, and 33.3% and 80.0%, respectively, for wanning acupuncture. There was a statistically significant difference in curative effect between wanning acupuncture plus point injection and acupuncture or wanning acupuncture （ both P 〈 0.01 ）. The curative effect was significant better in the former than in the latter. Conclusion This treatment has a good effect on wrist tenosynovitis.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2007年第6期15-16,共2页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
腱鞘炎
穴位疗法
水针
温针疗法
Tenosynovitis
Point therapy
Point injection
Wanning acupuncture
