摘要
目的比较2种口腔健康教育方式对中学生口腔卫生状况的改善效果,寻求改善效果较佳的口腔健康教育方式。方法在四川省德阳市市区随机选取3所中学,每个学校均抽取103名12岁学生,男女比例接近1∶1。按学校随机将学生分为3组:老师模式组由口腔医生对老师进行口腔健康知识培训,再由老师对学生上健康教育课,学生在家刷牙;家长模式组由口腔医生对家长进行口腔健康教育培训,通过提高家长的口腔保健意识间接影响学生的口腔健康行为,学生在家刷牙;对照组不采取任何干预措施。对3组学生3个月后的口腔卫生状况改善情况进行比较。结果3个月后老师模式组学生的软垢指数(DI)、牙石指数(CI)和牙龈指数(GI)均明显下降(P<0.05),家长模式组学生的DI、CI无明显下降(P>0.05),GI明显上升(P<0.05)。老师模式组学生口腔健康教育后DI、CI、GI指数改善情况优于家长模式组和对照组(P<0.01)。结论以老师和学校为媒介的口腔健康教育模式对中学生口腔卫生状况的改善效果优于以家长为媒介的口腔健康教育模式。老师在口腔健康促进活动中起到了重要的作用。
Objective To compare the effectiveness of two oral health education program among middle-school students on improving oral health status. Methods Three middle schools randomly chosen from the urban district of Deyang city were divided into three groups： teacher-based group （Group T）, parents-based group （Group P）, and the control group （Group C）. Oral health education sessions were conducted for teachers （Group T） and parents （Group P） of these children. Students obtained oral health knowledge through their teachers （Group T） or their parents （Group P）, brushed their teeth twice daily. No oral health education session was carried out in the control group. The effectiveness of oral health status in three groups were compared after 3 months. Results The debris index （DI）, calculus index （CI） and gingival index （GI） of group T obviously decreased after 3 months （P〈0.05）. The decreasing of DI and CI of group P were not significant, and the GI of group P obviously increased after 3 months （P〈0.05）. Compared with group P and group C, DI, CI, and GI of group T were statistically lower （P〈0.01）. Conclusion Compared with parents-based oral health education, teacher-based oral health education has a better effect on improvement of the oral health status among middle-school students.
出处
《华西口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第3期266-268,共3页
West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词
口腔健康教育
口腔卫生指数
牙龈指数
学校
家长
oral health education： oral health index： gingival index
school
parents
