期刊文献+

超声引导下Mammotome微创活检术与针吸细胞学检查对乳腺癌诊断价值的评价 被引量:1

The comparison between mammotome minimally invasive biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology on breast cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较Mammotome微创活检术(MMIBS)与针吸细胞学检查(FNAC)对乳腺癌诊断的应用价值。方法对68例乳腺癌患者术前行超声引导下MMIBS及FNAC,并对两种方法的诊断价值进行评价。结果68例患者超声显示率为100%。MMIBS阳性率为97.1%,FNAC为72.1%(P>0.05);MMIBS假阴性率为2.9%,FNAC为27.9%(19/68)(P<0.05)。结论FNAC简便、安全、创伤小,但有阳性率较低、漏诊率较高之不足;MMIBS具有高确诊率、低漏诊率、微创之特点,可作为乳腺肿块定性的首选。 Objective To explore the clinical value of mammotome minimally invasive biopsy (MMIBS) vs fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) on breast cancer. Methods Sixty - eight cases of breast cancer were subjected to MMIBS and FNAC under the guidance of ultrasound. The diagnostic value of two methods was evaluated. Results The needle positions in 68 patients were all visualized (100%) under the guidance of ultrasound. Among them, the positive rate of MMIBS and FNAC was 97.1% and 72.1% respectively ( P 〉 0.05 ). The pseudonegative rate of MMIBS and FNAC was 2.9 % and 27.9 % respectively ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion FNAC is convenient,safe,microinvasive,but has lower positive rate and higher pseudonegative rate. MMIBS was the characters of micro- invasion, high definitive and low pseudonegative rate. MMIBS was recommended as the first choice of definitive diagnosis for breast cancer.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2007年第6期402-403,共2页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 MAMMOTOME 细胞学 乳腺癌 超声引导 mammotome cytology breast cancer ultrasound guided
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ljung BM,Drejet A,Chiampi N,et al.Diagnosis accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician training in sampling technique[J].Cancer 2001,93(2):263-268.
  • 2Fine RE,Israel PZ,Walker LC,et al.A prospective study of the removal rate of imaged breast lesion by an 11-gauge vacuum assisted biopsy probe device[J].Am J Surg,2001,182(4):335-340.
  • 3Sperber F,Blank A,Metser U,et al.Diagnosis and treatment of breast fibroadenomas by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy[J].Arch Surg,2003,136(7):796-800.
  • 4Fine RE,Whitworth PW,Kim JA,et al.Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device[J].Am J Surg,2003,186(4):362-367.
  • 5赵润珍,赵宏耀,田金红.乳腺癌110例针吸细胞学检查与病理组织学检查对比分析[J].实用医技杂志,2004,11(07B):1295-1295. 被引量:6
  • 6Meloni GB,Dessole S,Becchere MP,et al.Ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum biopsy for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesion[J].Ultrasound Obstel Gynecol,2001,18(5):520-524.
  • 7杨林军,殷平,陈勇,李文巨.超声引导下mammotome微创旋切乳腺肿块42例分析[J].中国癌症杂志,2005,15(3):297-298. 被引量:28
  • 8廖宁,李学瑞,傅月珍,严金凤,吴一龙.B超引导下Mammotome旋切系统在乳腺微创外科中的应用研究(附320例报告)[J].岭南现代临床外科,2005,5(2):117-119. 被引量:69
  • 9Fine RE,Boyd BA,Whithworth PW,et al.Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance[J].Am J Surg,2002,184(4):332-336.
  • 10Joshi M,Duva-Frissora A,Padmanabhan R,et al.Atypical ductual hyperplasia in stereotactic breast biopsies:enhanced accuracy of diagnosis with the mammotome[J].Breast,2001,7(4):207-213.

二级参考文献6

共引文献90

同被引文献3

  • 1Luo HJ, Chen X, Tu G, et al. Therapeutic application of' ultrasound- guided 8-gauge Mammotome system in presumed benign breast lesions [ J ]. Breast J,2011 , 17 (5) :490-497.
  • 2李小雷.Mammotome微创旋切术治疗乳腺肿瘤245例分析[J].临术外科杂志,2007,15(10):714-715.
  • 3王永霞,张爱玲,黄珂铭,张蓉,高学忠,曹茵.麦默通乳腺微创旋切术与传统手术的对比研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2010,17(8):615-618. 被引量:61

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部