摘要
时下学界对“疑古”思潮的反思,仍大多局限在“疑古”派的某些早期的观点和对中国文化传统的破坏上。这是作为“意识形态”的“疑古”思潮,只是它的一个层面。本文认为,从《古史辨》第一册到第二册之间,面对考古发现和新材料不断涌现的挑战,“疑古”思潮发生了一个重要的转向,即从意识形态的思想冲击到学术典范的建立,从而把它的视角主要集中在人们观念中的“上古”。《古史辨》第三册反映了顾颉刚“疑古”方法论的逐步完善,回到文献考订后,“层累造成古史”理论得到了发展。
The reflection on thoughts of suspicion about ancient china history are still limited to some viewpoints in its early time and its destroy to traditional culture now. However it just is one aspect of thoughts as ideology. My article emphasizes that gushibian movement had a significant turning from Gushibian Volume Ⅰ to Ⅱ , facing archaeological finding and rush of new historical materials. This significant turning was from ideology which caused great thought impacts to the finding of academical paradigm. After that, GuJiegang focused his view on ancient china history in human＇s concept. Gushibian Volume Ⅲ symboled the maturity of Gu＇ s methodology. Returning to textual research, Gu history. progressed developed his theory of accumulatively formed
history.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期57-67,共11页
Journal of Historiography
关键词
“疑古”
“层累造成古史说”殷墟发掘
“科学主义”
Thoughts of suspicion about ancient china history Theory of accumulatively formed history Archaeological finding in anyang Scientism
