期刊文献+

提高腹膜透析相关感染性腹膜炎致病菌培养阳性率的方法学研究 被引量:16

Improved culture methods of effluent in peritoneal dialysis-related infectious peritonitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改进腹膜透析相关感染性腹膜炎透出液致病菌的培养方法,提高病原菌的培养阳性率。方法收集27例患者45例次腹膜炎透出液标本。腹膜炎患者透出液同时按以下6组方法分别进行致病菌培养:传统平板法、离心平板法、BacT/Alert培养瓶法(PF瓶法、SA瓶法、SN瓶法)和冻融法。结果离心平板组阳性率高于传统平板组,差异具统计学意义(60.0%比44.4%,P<0.05);与离心平板组相比,PF瓶组(84.4%)、SA瓶组(82.2%)和SN瓶组(82.2%)阳性率均提高(P均<0.01)。在检测致病菌生长所需时间(TDG)方面,与离心平板组[(24.31±9.80)h]相比,PF瓶组[(14.25±9.13)h]、SA瓶组[(12.75±7.47) h]和SN瓶组[(9.79±4.14)h]的TDG均缩短(P均<0.01);SN瓶组的TDG比PF瓶组和SA瓶组更显著缩短(P均<0.01)。结论离心法能显著提高培养阳性率。BacT/Alert培养系统与普通平板技术相比,能显著提高培养阳性率并缩短检测致病菌生长所需时间。SN培养瓶法检测致病菌生长所需时间最短。 Objective To compare improved culture methods of pathogenic organism in peritoneal effluent with conventional methods, in order to decrease the culture-negative rate of pathogenic organism in patients with peritoneal dialysis(PD)-related infectious peritonitis. Methods Effluents of 45 peritonitis episodes from 27 patients were included. Effluents were cultured with different methods dividing into the following 6 culture groups: conventional plate group (P group), centrifugation plate group (CP group), BacT/Alert culture bottle groups (PF group, SA group and SN group) and frozen-lysis group (FL group). Results The culture-positive rate of CP group was significantly higher than that of P group (60.0% vs 44.4%, P〈0.05). Compared with CP group, the culture-positive rates of PF group (84.4%), SA group (82.2%) and SN group (82.2%) were significantly increased (all P〈0.01). Concerning the time to detect growth (TDG), compared with that of CP group [(24.31±9.80) h], those of PF group [(14.25±9.13) h], SA group [(12.75±7.47) h] and SN group [(9.79±4.14) h] were significantly shortened (all P〈0.01). SN group had the shortest TDG compared with PF group and SA group (all P〈0.01). Conclusions Centrifugation of effluent is proved to increase the culture-positive rate of pathogenic organism in patients with PD-related infectious peritonitis. Culturing the effluent with BacT/Alert system is superior to plate technique in the aspects of increased culture-positive rate and fastened speed to detect the microbiological growth. Culturing with SN bottle is the fastest method to detect microbiological growth in PD-related infectious peritonitis compared with PF bottle and SA bottle.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期345-350,共6页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
基金 高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金(2003061) 霍英东基金会高等院校青年教师基金(101044) 广东省科技计划项目(2004B30701001)
关键词 腹膜透析 腹膜炎 致病菌 培养方法 Peritoneal dialysis Peritonitis Pathogen Culture method
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Piraino B, Baille GR, Bemardini J, et al. Peritoneal dialysis related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int, 2005, 25:107-131.
  • 2郭群英,陈林,阳晓,杨念生,冯敏,姜宗培,毛海萍,陈崴,余学清.腹膜透析相关感染性腹膜炎致病菌及菌谱变化——单个腹膜透析中心15年回顾分析[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2006,22(12):719-724. 被引量:64
  • 3杨念生,钟琼,陈雄辉,汪涛,叶任高,余学清.持续性非卧床腹膜透析腹膜炎的致病菌及其耐药性[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2001,17(6):375-378. 被引量:21
  • 4Khare S, Yurack J, Toye B. Culture of dialysate in suspected CAPD associated peritonitis using the BacT/Alert system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 1996, 25:101-106.
  • 5Alfa M J, Degagne P, Olson N, et al. Improved detection of bacterial growth in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis effluent by use of BacT/Alert FAN bottles. J Clin Microbiol, 1997, 35:862-866.
  • 6Taylor PC, Poole-Warren I,A, Grundy RE. Increased microbial yield from eontinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis effluent after chemical or physical disruption of phagocytes. J Clin Microbiol, 1987, 25:580-583.
  • 7汪涛中,郑智华,叶任高,何柏林,李惠群.腹膜透析中腹膜炎的致病菌培养方法探讨[J].中华医学检验杂志,1996,19(1):41-41. 被引量:2
  • 8Holley JL, Moss AH. A prospective evaluation of blood culture versus standard plate technique for diagnosing peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis, 1989, 13:184-188,
  • 9Taylor PC. Routine laboratory diagnosis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis using centrifugation/ lysis and saponin-containing media. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 1994, 13:249-252.
  • 10Mesnard R, Corvisier JM, Sire JM, et al. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: evaluation of three new culture methods. Ann Biol Clin(Paris), 1993, 51:697-700.

二级参考文献26

  • 1叶任高,肾脏病诊断与治疗学,1994年,586页
  • 2Keane WF, Bailie GR, Boesehoten E, et al. Adult peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis treatment recommendations: 2000 update. Petit Dial Int, 2000, 20:396-411.
  • 3Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, et al. Peritoneal dialysisrelated infections recommendations: 2005 update. Petit Dial Int, 2005, 25:107-131.
  • 4Saito T, Iinuma Y, Takakura S, et al. Can BacT/Alert FA and FN blood culture bottles increase the recovery of microorganisms in the clinical laboratory? J Infect Chemother,2004, 10:343-347.
  • 5Zelenitsky S, Barns L, Findlay I, et al. Analysis of microbiological trends in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis from 1991 to 1998. Am J Kidney Dis, 2000, 36: 1009-1013.
  • 6Korbet SM, Vonesh EF, Firanek CA. Peritonitis in an urban peritoneal dialysis program: an analysis of infecting pathogens.Am J Kidney Dis, 1995, 26:47-53.
  • 7Bcmardini J, Hollcy JL, Johnston JR, ct al. An analysis of ten-year trends in infections in adults on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Clin Nephrol, 1991,36 : 29-34.
  • 8Krishnan M, Thodis E, Ikonomopoulos D, et al. Predictors of outcome following bacterial peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis.Petit Dial Int, 2002, 22:573-581.
  • 9Bibashi E, Memmos D, Kokolina E, et al. Fungal peritonitis complicating peritoneal dialysis during an l 1-year period:report of 46 cases. Clin Infect Dis, 2003, 36:927-931.
  • 10Taskapan H, Ozener C, Ates K, et al. The rate, risk factors, and outcome of fungal peritonitis in CAPD patients:experience in Turkey. Petit Dial Int, 2000, 20:338-341.

共引文献79

同被引文献108

引证文献16

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部