摘要
大陆法系和英美法系国家关于控制股东对第三人的民事责任的性质都做了相应的规定,认为控制股东滥用控制权,给第三人造成损害的应承担损害赔偿责任。我国关于控制股东对第三人的民事责任的性质,学界存在着违约责任和侵权责任两种观点。笔者认为,控制股东对债权人和其他中小股东的损害行为是一种侵权行为,应承担侵权赔偿责任。
The continent and Anglo-American law system countries give relevant definitions about the quality of the civil liabity of the controlling shareholders to the third party：if controlling shareholders abuse the power and damage the interests of the third party, they should responsible for the obligation of the compensation for damage. In China acadamy it exists two differ- ent views, namely, liability for breach of contract and liability for tort. The paper agrees with the latter that the damage which controlling shareholders bring to the medium and small shareholders and creditors should be compensated by controllingshareholders.
出处
《长江大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第2期61-63,79,共4页
Journal of Yangtze University（Social Sciences Edition）
关键词
控制股东
第三人
民事责任
性质
controlling shareholder
the third party
civil liability
quality
