期刊文献+

腹胸两切口加两野淋巴结清扫治疗胃食管交界部癌的临床研究 被引量:2

A clinical study of thoracic-abdominal double incision and two-field lymphadenectomy in treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胃食管交界部癌(EGJ 癌)的最佳手术方式及 Siewert 分型下淋巴结转移规律。方法 26例 EGJ 癌患者中,12例采取腹胸两切口+腹腔胸腔两野淋巴结清扫术(两切口组),14例采用常规左开胸 EGJ 癌切除+肿大淋巴结摘除术(常规组)。结果 (1)两切口组和常规组平均清扫淋巴结组数(分别为7.3组和3.5组,P<0.01)及平均检出转移淋巴结组数(分别为1.9组和0.9组,P<0.05)差异均有统计学意义;平均切除腹腔淋巴结个数(分别为20.5个和13.3个,P<0.01)及胸腔淋巴结个数(分别为8个和4.9个,P<0.05)差异也有统计学意义;两切口组食管切缘距肿瘤5.8 cm 多于常规组的5.1 cm;两切口未损伤膈肌,减少了对呼吸和循环系统的影响。(2)Siewert 分型:Ⅰ型腹腔转移不严重,Ⅱ型胸腹腔双向转移,Ⅲ型腹腔转移为主,3个亚型的淋巴结转移有差别。结论腹胸两切口+腹腔胸腔两野淋巴结清扫术有助于提高 EGJ 癌手术的根治性,有助于研究 EGJ癌的转移规律。 Objective To explore the best operation pattern of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer and the regularity of lymph node metastasis in EGJ cancer according to Siewert typing. Methods Twenty-six patients with EGJ cancer received esophagogastrectomy by thoracic-abdominal double incision and two-field lymphadenectomy (12 cases) or by traditional left postero-lateral thoracotomy and lymph node sampling ( 14 cases). The outcomes were analyzed with SPSS 10.0 software Results ( 1 ) The number of lymph node dissection group of the thoracic-abdominal double incision group was 7.3 lymph node groups, significantly more than that of the traditional left postero-lateral thoracotomy group ( 3.5 lymph node group, P 〈0. 001 ). The number of proved metastatic lymph nodes of the thoracic-abdominal double incision group was 1.9 groups, significantly higher than that of the traditional left postero-lateral thoracotomy group ( 0.9 group, P=0. 013). The distance between the esophageal incisal edge and the tumor was 5.8 cm in the thoracic-abdominal double incision, longer than that in the traditional left thoracotomy group (5.1 cm). The diaphragm was not damaged in the double-incision group, thus the influence to respiration and circulation was decreased. (2) The abdominal metastasis of Siewert type Ⅰ cancer was not severe, the cancer of type Ⅱ might metastasize to abdominal or thoracic cavity, and the main metastatic site of type Ⅲ cancer was abdominal cavity. Conclusion Thoracic-abdominal double incision and two-field lymphadenectomy helps increase the radical resection rate of EGJ cancer and study the regularity of lymph node metastasis.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第21期1478-1481,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 胃肿瘤 食管肿瘤 外科手术 淋巴结切除术 Stomach neoplasms Esophageal neoplasms Surgery procedures, operative Lymth node excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Wijnhoven BP, Louwman MW, Tilanus HW. Increased incidence of adenocarcinomas at the gastro-oesophageal junction in Dutch males since the 1990s. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2002, 14: 115-122.
  • 2Sihvo El, Salminen JT, Ramo J, et al. The epidemiology of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: has the cancer of gastric cardia an influence on the rising incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma? Scand J Gastroenterol, 2000, 35: 1082-1086.
  • 3Lagarde SM, Cense HA, Hulscher JB, et al. Prospective analysis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and lymph node metastasis in the proximal field of the chest. Br J Surg, 2005, 92:1404-1408.
  • 4王晓新,李宏芹,陈鸿义,刘桐林,李简.不同手术径路治疗贲门癌的对比研究[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(19):1262-1264. 被引量:43
  • 5熊宏超,张力建,杨跃,梁震,吴楠,陈晋峰.123例贲门癌外科治疗的临床分析[J].癌症,2006,25(1):100-104. 被引量:22
  • 6阴亮.食管贲门癌419例手术治疗临床分析[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(4):264-265. 被引量:5
  • 7Siewert JR, Holscher AH, Becker K, et al. Carcinoma of the cardia: an attempt for a therapeutical relevant classification. Chirurg, 1987, 58:25-32.
  • 8Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ. Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction: relevance of a topographic-anatomic subclassification. J Surg Oncol, 2005, 90: 139-146.
  • 9Zhang X, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, et al. Outcome of oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction. ANZ J Surg, 2005, 75:513-519.
  • 10Hulscher JB, van Lanschot JJ. Individualised surgical treatment of patients with an adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus or gastrooesophageal junction. Dig Surg, 2005, 22:130-134.

二级参考文献46

共引文献82

同被引文献25

  • 1杜泽森,傅俊惠,郑春鹏,李卓毅,郑浩胜,李佳杰.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术与传统开胸术式的临床对比研究[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(4):431-433. 被引量:14
  • 2方文涛,陈文虎,范利民,曹克俭,陈勇,蒋勇.食管癌切除术后不同重建途径吻合口瘘的原因及预防[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(3):217-219. 被引量:56
  • 3Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y. Current status and future perspectives on minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 46(4): 241-248.
  • 4Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(4): 486-494, discussion 494-485.
  • 5Baccari P, Castoldi R, Bisagni P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction. Suppl Tumori, 2005, 4(3): S129.
  • 6Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg, 2006, 203(1): 7-16.
  • 7Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, et al. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg, 1994, 220(3): 364-372.
  • 8Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, et al. Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg, 1995, 222(5): 654-662.
  • 9Cadiere GB, Torres R, Dapri G, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparos- copic oesophagectomy improves the quality of extended lymphad- enectomy. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(8): 1308-1309.
  • 10Bonavina L, Laface L, Abate E, et al. Comparison of ventilation and cardiovascular parameters between prone thoracoscopic and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Updates Surg, 2012, 64(2): 81-85.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部