期刊文献+

“认写分流、多认少写”汉字教学方法的实验研究 被引量:77

An experimental study on the effect of the method of ’Teaching the learner to recognize characters more than writing’
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文采用实验的方法比较“认写分流、多认少写”和“认写同步要求”两种汉字教学方法的效果。以两组识字和写字起点水平相同的留学生为实验对象,分别实施不同的汉字教学方法,经过3个月的教学实验,结果显示,“认写分流、多认少写”组的识字、写字效果均好于“认写同步要求”组。 The present study, based on an experiment, compared the effects of two different methods of teaching Chinese characters, i.e. 'teaching the learner to recognize characters more than writing’ and 'teaching character recognization and writing simultaneosly’. In the experiment,two groups of foreign students who were at the same level in character recognition and writing were instructed with these two mothods for 3 months respectively. The results showed that the group using the former method performed better in both character recognition and writing than the group using the latter method.
作者 江新
出处 《世界汉语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期91-97,共7页 Chinese Teaching in the World
关键词 认写分流 多认少写 认写同步 对外汉字教学 teaching the learner to recognize characters more than writing, teaching Chinese characters to foreign learners
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1崔永华.基础汉语教学模式的改革[J].世界汉语教学,1999,13(1):4-9. 被引量:95
  • 2丁崇明.(2005),西方汉语学习者汉字教学策略,西方学习者汉字认知国际研讨会论文,德国美因茨大学.
  • 3江新.针对西方学习者的汉字教学:认写分流、多认少写.赵金铭.对外汉语教学的全方位探索.商务印书馆,2005.338~364
  • 4柯传仁,沈禾玲.回顾与展望:美国汉语教学理论研究述评[J].语言教学与研究,2003(3):1-17. 被引量:14
  • 5潘先军.(2000),对外汉字教学与小学识字教学,见《第六届国际汉语教学讨论会论文选》,北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 6石定果.(1999),从认知科学看对外汉字教学,见吕必松主编.《汉字与汉字教学研究论文集》,北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 7宋连谊.(2000),汉语教学中只重认读不求书写的可行性,见《第六届国际汉语教学讨论会论文选》,北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 8王际平.(2005),浅谈对拼音文字为母语的汉语求学者的汉字教学,西方学习者汉字认知国际研讨会论文,德国美因茨大学.
  • 9杨夷平,易洪川.(1999),浅析识字教学的对内、对外差别,见吕必松主编.《汉字与汉字教学研究论文集》,北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 10翟汛.(1999),关于初级汉语读写课中汉字教学与教材编写的思考,见吕必松主编.《汉字与汉字教学研究论文集》,北京:北京大学出版社.

二级参考文献57

  • 1Li, C. & Sandra, T. 1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • 2Li, W. 1999 Second Language Acquisition of Discourse-and Pragmatically-Governed Word Order in Mandarin Chinese,Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 34(2), 37--70.
  • 3McGinnis, S. 1996 Tonal Distinction Errors by Beginning Chinese Language Students: A Comparative Study of American English and Japanese Native Speakers, In S. McGinnis (Ed.) Chinese Pedagogy : Am Emerging Field (pp. 81--91), Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Foreign Language Publications.
  • 4McGinnis, S. 1999 Student Goals and Approaches, In M. Chu (Ed.), Mapping the Course of the Chinese Language Field , 151 -- 175, (Chinese Language Teachers Association Monograph Series, Volume Ⅲ), Kalamazoo, MI: Chinese Language Teachers Association.
  • 5Meyer, B. J. F. 1985 Prose Analysis: Purposes, Procedures, and Problems, In B. K. Britton, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text, 11--64, Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum Publishers.
  • 6Creswell, J. W. 1994 Research Design, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • 7Everson, M.E. 1988 Speed and Comprehension in Reading Chinese: Romanization vs. Characters revisited. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 23(2), 1-16.
  • 8Everson, M. E. 1998 Word Recognition among Learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language: Investigating the Relationship between Naming and Knowing,Modern Language Journal, 82, 194--204.
  • 9Evenson, M. E. , & Ke, C. 1997 An Inquiry into the Reading Strategies of Intermediate and Advanced Learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 32, 1--22.
  • 10Fuller, J. & Gundel, K. 1987 Topic-Prominence in Interlanguage, Language Learning , 37, 1--18.

共引文献109

同被引文献800

引证文献77

二级引证文献268

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部