期刊文献+

作为时代的自我理解的哲学史研究——中国近现代哲学史研究的一个向度 被引量:5

Studies of History of Philosophy as the Self-understanding of Times——One Dimension of the Studies of History of Chinese Modern-Contemporary Philosophy
原文传递
导出
摘要 The research of Chinese modern history of philosophy, as one kind of modern academic forms, has a close relationship with the self-understanding of times. Philosophy and times have both external and internal relations. If we synthesize them dialectically, We’ll realize that it is necessary to capture the connection between history as the guide of the search of Zeitgeist (Time sprite). Then, that philosophy is the expression of Zeitgeist shows much wider methodical meaning. Since modern time, Chinese seek reform ceaselessly and are always confused by how to understand the change of times. The research of three philosophical schools’common intention shows that the modernity, with the request of the power as the center, consists of the common dimension of the turn of Chinese ancient philosophy to modern one. The division of modernity itself shows the opposite between Scientism and Humanism, and the opposite between Positivism and Irrationalism. To reflect such modern phenomena is one of the major issues of Chinese modern philosophy. It registers that we should pay proper attention to the approach of sociology of knowledge, to the function of social existence, and to the connection between philosophy and other contemporary ideology, as well as the whole spiritual phenomena. Then, the area of Chinese modern philosophical research will be expanded greatly. To such wider area, we should be equipped with equal sight and critical mind. The research of Chinese modern history of philosophy, as one kind of modern academic forms, has a close relationship with the self-understanding of times. Philosophy and times have both external and internal relations. If we synthesize them dialectically, We’ll realize that it is necessary to capture the connection between history as the guide of the search of Zeitgeist (Time sprite). Then, that philosophy is the expression of Zeitgeist shows much wider methodical meaning. Since modern time, Chinese seek reform ceaselessly and are always confused by how to understand the change of times. The research of three philosophical schools’common intention shows that the modernity, with the request of the power as the center, consists of the common dimension of the turn of Chinese ancient philosophy to modern one. The division of modernity itself shows the opposite between Scientism and Humanism, and the opposite between Positivism and Irrationalism. To reflect such modern phenomena is one of the major issues of Chinese modern philosophy. It registers that we should pay proper attention to the approach of sociology of knowledge, to the function of social existence, and to the connection between philosophy and other contemporary ideology, as well as the whole spiritual phenomena. Then, the area of Chinese modern philosophical research will be expanded greatly. To such wider area, we should be equipped with equal sight and critical mind.
作者 高瑞泉
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期29-37,共9页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈寅恪,1980年.《冯友兰哲学史上册审察报告》,载《金明馆丛稿第二编》,上海古籍出版社.
  • 2陈友松.《时代的分析》[J].观察,1946,1(3).
  • 3冯契,1996年a.《冯契文集》第1卷,华东师范大学出版社.
  • 4冯友兰,1987年.《中国近代哲学史》,人民出版社.
  • 5哈贝马斯.《现代性的哲学话语》[M].译林出版社,2004年版.第74页.
  • 6黑格尔.《哲学史讲演录》第1卷[M].商务印书馆,1983年版.第31页.
  • 7金岳霖.《论道》[M].商务印书馆,1985年版.第16页.
  • 8.《梁漱溟全集》[M].山东人民出版社,1989年版.第659-660页.
  • 9洛夫乔伊,2006年.《反思观念史》,载丁耘,陈新主编.《思想史研究》第1卷,广西师范大学出版社.
  • 10牟宗三,1997年b.《中国哲学之会通十四讲》,上海古籍出版社.

共引文献122

同被引文献27

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部