期刊文献+

人的生命价值评估方法述评 被引量:25

Review on Methods for Evaluating the Value of a Statistical Life
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 评估生命价值最常用的两种方法是人力资本法和支付意愿法。用人力资本法评估生命价值的前提是人的生命可以用一个人未来的生产能力来计量,而用支付意愿法评估生命价值的前提是人的生命可以用一个人为降低死亡风险而愿意支付的货币金额来计量。支付意愿法又包括工资—风险法、消费市场法和条件价值法3种类型。工资—风险法通过分析一个人的工资与其工作风险之间的关系来估算生命价值;消费市场法关注的是人们在其进行消费决策时,在风险与价格之间的权衡;而条件价值法则是给定一个假定情景,请被访者对货币和风险进行直接权衡来估算生命价值。笔者对国内外生命价值评估研究进行述评,指出了各种评估方法的优缺点。支付意愿法已成为国外学者评估生命价值的主流方法,学习借鉴国外的研究经验,将这一方法运用于我国的生命价值评估研究是今后国内研究的一个方向。 The most commonly used methods to evaluate the value of a statistical life (VSL) are human capital (HK) approach and willingness to pay (WTP) approach. HK approach is based upon the idea that a life should be measured by an individual's potentials for future production, and WTP approach upon the idea that value of life can be estimated by the quantity of money a person would be willing to pay to reduce the risk of death. WTP approach includes three kinds of approaches; one is "wage-risk" approach which calculates VSL by correlating a person~ wages with the degree of risk she or he encounters at work ; another is "consumer market" approach which calculates VSL by examining the balance people make between risk and price; the rest is "condition-valuation" approach which calculates VSL by setting a hypothetical scenario in which respondents must make a balance between currency and risk of death. This paper reviews evaluating methods for VSL at home and abroad, and points out their advantages and disadvantages. WTP approach has been widely used to estimate the value of a statistical life by scholars abroad. So it is a tendency to use WTP method to valuate the VSL in China.
作者 梅强 陆玉梅
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 2007年第3期56-61,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 生命价值(VSL) 评估方法 人力资本法 支付意愿法 条件价值法 value of a statistical life(VSL) evaluation method human capital approach approach of willingness to pay condition-valuation approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

二级参考文献87

  • 1崔新建.略论人的生命价值[J].人文杂志,1996(3):6-11. 被引量:5
  • 2金平.论人的经济价值[J].西北人口,2001,22(4):8-11. 被引量:3
  • 3田水承,李红霞.也论矿井开采系统安全可靠性的评价[J].煤炭工程师,1993(5):26-28. 被引量:2
  • 4李伟,赵延奎.测算疾病间接成本的摩擦成本法[J].国外医学(卫生经济分册),1996,13(3):134-138. 被引量:4
  • 5Y.巴泽尔.产权的经济分析[M].上海:上海三联书店,1997..
  • 6R.科斯.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海三联书店,1994..
  • 7田水承 李红霞.煤矿安全成本分析与煤矿安全投入对策[J].煤炭科研参考资料,1996,(1).
  • 8The costs to Britian of workplace accidents and work-related ill health in 1995/1996[M].HSE Books, 1999
  • 9Marin, Alan, and George Psacharopoulos. The Reward for Risk in the Labor Market: Evidence from the United Kingdom and a Reconciliation with Others Studies[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1982,90(4): 827-853
  • 10Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Joel Huber. Pricing Health Risks: Survey Assessment of Risk-Risk and Risk-Dollar Tradeoffs[J],Journal of Enviorment Economics and Management,1991,21(1), 32-51

共引文献102

同被引文献366

引证文献25

二级引证文献226

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部