期刊文献+

同行评议专家评议结果修正研究

Study on Amending Evaluation Results of Experts Went along
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:对同行评议专家进行分类,对其中评议结果明显偏离整体的专家结果进行修正,使评议结果更趋于真实。方法:以专家评议结果的平均绝对离差和平均相对离差为指标,通过K-means聚类方法,对全部评议专家进行分类,对明显偏离整体的专家评议结果赋予权重。结论:经对赋予权重修正后,评议结果更加符合整体专家意见。 Objective : To improve the reliability of evaluation results by amending the results which were obviously different with the others'. Methods: Setting the mean utter and relative deviation from mean as indexes, the author classified the experts with K - means clustering and endowed weights to the results which deviated the common results. Conclusion: The evaluation result are more fit to the common results after amending the results.
出处 《解放军医院管理杂志》 2007年第4期259-260,共2页 Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(70473110)
关键词 基金项目 同行评议 fund item evaluation by experts went along
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献6

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部