摘要
秦山第二核电厂经过几个燃料循环后,为了提高经济性,准备改进燃料管理策略。因此在燃料管理策略改进前,应先进行经济性评估。从经济性角度,比较了年度1/4换料与18个月换料这两种燃料管理策略的优劣。
In order to improve economic benefit, the Second Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant prepares to amend its fuel management philosophy after several fuel cycles. Economic evaluation is necessary before amendment of fuel management philosophy. Strong points and shortcomings are compared in this paper between yearly 1/4 refueling philosophy and 18 months refueling philosophy.
出处
《核科学与工程》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第4期380-384,共5页
Nuclear Science and Engineering
