期刊文献+

从R-μ-T关系研究成果看我国钢筋混凝土结构的抗震措施 被引量:24

Seismic measures for RC structures in view of R-μ-T relations
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在归纳整理国内外单自由度非弹性体系R-μ-T规律的研究成果和多自由度非弹性体系R-μ规律研究成果的基础上,强调了在建筑结构传统抗震设计方法中选择合适的地震力降低系数R和严格程度与其对应的抗震措施是在抗震设计中实现设防目标,特别是实现强震下性态控制的核心手段。在就这一核心手段对各国抗震设计规范进行对比后发现,国外规范无一例外地遵循了R-μ基本准则,只有我国建筑抗震设计多年来采用相同的R值,但抗震措施从9度区到7度区逐级下降,不符合R-μ基本准则的设计手法。已完成的严格按照我国规范要求设计的典型钢筋混凝土框架结构的多波输入非弹性动力分析初步证实,由于采用这种与R-μ基本准则不符的设计手法,我国钢筋混凝土建筑结构的抗震能力与其所在烈度区的抗震需求相比从9度区到7度0.15 g区逐级下降。这一问题应引起国内学术界和设计界的重视、研究和讨论。 Based on the main research findings of R-μ-T relations for single-degree-of-freedom systems and multi-degree-of-freedom systems, this paper emphasizes that it's the key measure to determine proper force reduction factor R with matching seismic fortification measures for the realization of performance objectives under earthquakes at various levels, especially performance control under strong earthquakes. After comparison among seismic design codes of different countries, it is obvious that all the influential foreign seismic design codes follow the "R-μ principle" ; however, Chinese seismic design codes adopt fixed force reduction factor R with more and more relaxed seismic fortification measures for regions from intensity 9 to intensity 7. The completed inelastic dynamic analysis of series of typical structures designed according to GB50011-2001 under certain ground motions reveals that the ratios of seismic capacity to seismic demand tend to decrease from intensity 9 to intensity 7 (0.15 g). This issue should be paid more attention and would cause further study and discussion in the Chinese academic and engineering design circles.
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期144-151,共8页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(59878056)
关键词 R-μ-T关系 R-μ基本准则 抗震措施 性态控制 R-μ-T relations R-μ principle" seismic fortification measures performance control
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Newmark N M,Hall W J.Earthquake Spectra and Design[M].EERI Monograph Series.Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.Oakland.California.USA.1982
  • 2Krawinkler H,Nassar A A.Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demand and capacities,Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings[C].Fajfar and Krawinkler,ed.Elsevier Applied Science.New York.USA.1992:23~40.
  • 3Miranda E,Bertero V V.Evaluation of strength reduction factor for earthquake-resistance design[J].Earthquake Spectra,1994,10(2):357~379.
  • 4Miranda E.Site-dependent strength-reduction factors[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(12):3503~3519.
  • 5Vidic T,Fajfar P,Fischinger M.Consistent inelastic design spectra:strength and displacement[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1994,23(3):507~521.
  • 6Borzi B,Elnashai A S.Refined force reduction factors for seismic design[J].Journal of Engineering Structures,2000,22 (5):1244~1260.
  • 7卓卫东,范立础.结构抗震设计中的强度折减系数研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(1):84-88. 被引量:65
  • 8翟长海,公茂盛,张茂花,谢礼立,张敏政.工程结构等延性地震抗力谱研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(1):22-29. 被引量:40
  • 9吕西林,周定松.考虑场地类别与设计分组的延性需求谱和弹塑性位移反应谱[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(1):39-48. 被引量:86
  • 10Seneviratna G D P K,Krawinkler H.Modifications of seismic demands for MDOF systems,Proc.11th WCEE[C].IAEE.Acapulco.Mexico.1996:Paper1446.

二级参考文献28

  • 1时振梁,陈汉尧.基岩地震反应谱随震级、距离的变化特征[J].地震工程与工程振动,1995,15(1):14-17. 被引量:5
  • 2翟长海 谢礼立 张敏政.非弹性设计反应谱研究[R]..科技部社会公益研究专项基金(2001DIB20098)研究报告[C].,2003年3月..
  • 3.GB0011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].中建筑工业出版社,2001..
  • 4.GBJ50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].中国建筑工业出版社,2001..
  • 5ATCAO Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Conctete Buildings[R]. Applied Technology Council, 1996.
  • 6FEMA 273 NEHRP Guidelines for seismic Rehabilitation of buildings [R]. Federal Emergency Management Agency,1997.
  • 7SEAOC Vision 2000 a Framework for Performance-based Engineering [ R]. Structural Engineering Association d California,1995.
  • 8BSSC (1998) NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulation of new buildings and other structures[R]. Report No: FEMA302, Washington, D. C.
  • 9FEMA 368 (2000) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures [ R]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  • 10FEMA 355 (2000) State of the art report on connection performance [ R ]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D. C.

共引文献2563

同被引文献282

引证文献24

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部