摘要
目的探讨产后恢复仪治疗产妇尿潴留的疗效。方法按入院日单、双号将96例产后尿潴留产妇分为观察组和对照组。观察组产后使用恢复仪治疗尿潴留,对照组用传统的物理诱导方法治疗尿潴留,比较两组的效果。结果两组治疗效果比较,x2=23.37,P<0.001差异有统计学意义。结论产后恢复仪治疗产后尿潴留的疗效明显优于传统物理诱导方法,且疗程短,值得在产科推广。
Objective To Observe the therapeutic effect of the healing equipment on uroschesis after parturition based on its principle. Methods The healing equipment was used for treatment of 48 cases of uroschesis after parturition as the observation group, and traditional physical induction methods for treatment of 48 cases as control group. Their therapeutic effects were compared. Results The therapeutic effect between two groups was significant different, x^2 ： 23.37, P 〈 0. 001. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of the healing equipment after parturition is better than that of traditional physical induction methods, and its therapeutic course is very short, so it should be get pervasion and generalization in hospital.
出处
《护理与康复》
2007年第3期186-187,共2页
Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation
关键词
尿潴留
产后恢复仪
护理
uroschesis
healing equipment
nursing care
