摘要
精神损害赔偿制度虽然在我国起步较晚,但是发展却非常迅速,几乎人人都知晓精神损害或精神损害赔偿,司法实践中的案例也是层出不穷。但在生活口语中,“精神损害”和“精神损害赔偿”往往是同时表达同一个意思,即要么是表示受到了精神损害,要么是表示需要适用精神损害赔偿制度;我们不必对大众在法律术语的使用上做过高要求,但在理论研究上则有必要对这两个概念进行明确的区分,以避免理论上的混乱和立法上的瑕疵。
Although emotional distress compensation system appeared comparatively late in our country, it develops rapidly.Nearly everyone knows something about emotional distress damage and emotional distress compensation. And there are many cases concerning them in judicial circle. But in daily life, in most cases, emotional distress damage and emotional distress compensation express the same meaning: someone suffers from emotional distress or the emotional distress compensation system is needed. We don't need to set high standards in people's using of the judicial terms, but we should draw a clear distinction between them in theoretical study to avoid theoretical confusion and legal flaws.
出处
《重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第2期43-46,共4页
Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
损害
耪神损害
精神损害赔偿
damage
emotional distress damage
emotional distress compensation