摘要
从知识社会学的视角,陶行知研究大致可以分为三种类型:史观学派的、史料学派的、融和贯通的陶行知研究。潘开沛的《陶行知思想的批判》是史观学派陶行知研究的典型,它表现了陶行知研究中存在强烈的意图伦理色彩和政治建构特征;以胡晓风为代表的《陶行知全集》整理工作是史料学派陶行知研究的典范,它为20世纪90年代多元化的陶行知研究提供了统一的文献基础,大大推进了陶行知研究的深度。章开沅、唐文权的《平凡的神圣》,胡晓风、金成林的《陶行知与中国现代化》是融和贯通的陶行知研究的代表性著作。它们尝试在中西文化教育史观和现代化模式之下,重新解读陶行知思想与实践,还历史的本真面目。陶行知研究范型的嬗变是学术发展的内在继承与突破、政治社会的现实制约、研究共同体的学识、情感复杂互动的结果。
Research into Tao Xingzhi may fall research being based on conception of history, into three categories from the perspective of sociology of knowledge. research being based on historical documentation, and comprehensire research. Pan Kaipei＇s Criticism on Tao Xingzhi＇s Thoughts, being the exemplar of the research based on conception of history, shows that the research has a strong ethical coloring and political features. The Complete Works of Tao Xingzhi by Hu Xiaofeng is a representative of the research based on historical documentation which has provided unified basic documentation for the varied researches into Tao Xingzhi in 1990s. The Sacred of the Common by Zhang Kaiyuan and Tang Wenquan and Tao Xingzhi and Chinese Modernization by Hu Xiaofeng and Jin Chenlin is an exemplar work of comprehensive study. All of them have tried to re-examine Tao Xingzhi＇s thoughts and his practice and to restore the historical truth with the perspective of Chinese and western historical conception of education. The changes in models of research into Tao Xingzhi are the result of the internal heritage and breakthrough of academic developments, actual restrictions from political society, erudition of the common research subject and complicated interaction of emotions and feelings.
出处
《南京晓庄学院学报》
2007年第2期10-19,63,共11页
Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
关键词
陶行知研究
研究范型
知识社会学
research into Tao Xingzhi
research model
sociology of learning
