摘要
事实推定是司法证明的一种重要的辅助性方法,其在证据证明力所不及的地方发挥着不可替代的作用。但是,事实推定自身所具有的或然性与主观性局限亦无可讳言。对事实推定的适用进行规制十分必要。确立以置后适用规则、保守适用规则、公开适用规则为主要内容的事实推定规则和通过正规的法学院教育、统一的司法资格考试、法官职业培训、法官继续教育形成法官职业群体同质化的思维方式是最大可能克服事实推定局限性的相对有效路径。
Fact assumption plays an important role in the area that evidence a not enough, and therefore is an important auxiliary method in judicial proof. However, since it has limits like probability and subjectivity, it＇s necessary to be regulated. Comparatively effective approaches includes setting rules on fact assumption such as posit use, preservative use, publicly use, as well as forming same essence thinking mode through official legal education, unified judicial examination and further education for the profession.
出处
《当代法学》
北大核心
2007年第2期24-30,共7页
Contemporary Law Review
关键词
事实推定
规制
事实推定规则
同质化思维方式
fact assumption
regulation
rules on fact assumption
same essence thinking mode
