摘要
“异化”概念包含着一个最基本的含义,即,当说一种东西成为一种“异化”的力量反过来压制人、左右人时,就有一个预设在里面,即,这种东西本来应该属于人,为人所控制。马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中阐述“异化劳动”概念的第一个规定性,劳动产品的异化时潜藏着工人的劳动产品本来应该属于工人的预设;在阐述“异化劳动”概念的第二个规定性,劳动活动本身的异化时潜藏着劳动本来应该是为人所自由掌握和运用的人的本质的预设;在阐述“异化劳动”概念的第三个规定性,人的类特性的异化时包含着自由自觉性本来应该是人的类本质的预设。挖掘出马克思《手稿》中的应然预设,有助于我们对《手稿》的理解。
The conception of alienation contains a basic meaning, when we say something is a kind of alienating power, we implicate a presupposition that something ought to belong to man and be controlled by man. There is the presupposition that the manufacture ought to belong to the worker when Marx defined the first meaning of the alienation concept, the alienating of manufacture in Marx＇s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844; There is other presupposition that the labor ought to belong to man＇s substance when he defined the second meaning of the alienation concept, the alienating of labor; And there is the third presupposition that the consciousness ought to belong to the generic nature of man when he defined the third meaning of the alienation concept, the alienating of the generic nature of man. Digging out these presuppositions in Marx＇s manuscript contributes to comprehending the manuscript.
出处
《安徽广播电视大学学报》
2007年第1期1-4,8,共5页
Journal of Anhui Radio & TV University
关键词
马克思
异化
劳动产品
劳动力
类本质
Mars
alienation
manufacture
labor force
generic nature
