期刊文献+

分类和回归树分析预测闭合性重型颅脑损伤预后的研究 被引量:14

Classification and regression tree for prediction of the outcome of severe closed brain injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立一个关于闭合性重型颅脑损伤预后的简单、便于使用、变量可以在日常工作中快速获得的预测准确率高的预测模型。方法采用分类和回归树(classification and regression tree,CART)分析方法,选择8个预后因子,对579例闭合性重型颅脑损伤患者的预后进行分析,预后指标为外伤后6个月GOS。结果GCS是最好的预测因子,血糖、头颅CT表现、年龄、瞳孔情况是强有力的预测因子,白细胞计数也对预后产生有意义的影响。CART中的所有变量都与预后相关,预测准确率达87%。结论CART预测模型能较好地预测闭合性重型颅脑损伤患者的预后,是一种简单有效、准确率高的预测方法。 Objective To develop a simple and convenient predictive model with a high predictive accuracy, involving variables that can be rapidly and easily achieved in daily routine practice for the outcome of severe closed brain injury. Methods A classification and regression tree (CART) techniques were employed in the analysis of data from 579 cases with severe closed brain injury. A total of 8 prognostic indicators were selected, while Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) at 6 months "after severe closed brain injury was used as prognostic criterion. Results Our results indicated that GCS was the best predictor of outcome. Glucose level, computed tomographic findings, age and pupillary response were proved to be strong predictors. In the meantime, leukocytosis was found to correlate significantly with prognosis. The overall predictive aecuracy of the CART model for these data was 87%. All variables included in this tree were found to be related to the hinged external fixators outcome. Conclusion The CART proves to be a useful and accurate method in developing a simple and effective model for predicting outcome after severe closed brain injury.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期167-170,共4页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词 脑损伤 重型 预后 因素分析 统计学 Brain injuries, severe Prognosis Factor analysis Statistics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Uear T, Baykal A, Akyuz M, et al. Comparison of serum and cerebrospinal fluid protein S - 100b levels after severe head injury and their prognostic importance. J Trauma, 2004, 57:95 -98.
  • 2Amantini A, Grippo A, Fossi S, et al. Prediction of "awakening" and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs. Clin Neurophysiol,2005, 116:229 - 235.
  • 3Gan BK, Lim JH, Ng IH. Outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury amongst the elderly in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2004, 33:63 -67.
  • 4Hukkelhoven C, Steyerberg E, Dik J, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognosis score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma, 2005, 22:1025 - 1039.
  • 5Pillai SV, Kolluri VR, Praharaj SS. Outcome prediction model for severe diffuse brain injuries: development and evaluation. Neurol India,2003, 51:345 -349.

同被引文献151

引证文献14

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部