期刊文献+

环孢素与甲氨蝶呤治疗中度支气管哮喘的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Therapeutic Effects between Cyclosorin or Methotrexate
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价环孢素与甲氨蝶呤分别治疗对糖皮质激素不敏感的中度支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法25例中度支气管哮喘患者,分为A、B两组:A组15例,应用甲氨蝶呤,每周10mg,po,qd;B组10例,应用环孢素3mg·kg^-1·d^-1,po,qd。共3个疗程:第1个疗程12周,其后每间隔4-6周,再行第2,3个疗程治疗(每次4周)。观察临床疗效及肺功能变化。结果A组和B组总有效率分别为73.3%,90.0%(P〈0.05)。B组肺功能指标(FEV1%)明显改善(P〈0.01)。结论小剂量环孢素治疗中度支气管哮喘疗效优于甲氨蝶呤,且使用方便,疗效好,未见明显不良反应,相对较安全。 Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of cyclosorin (CsA) and methotrexate (MTX) in treating moderate asthma which is insensitive to glucocorticoids. Methods Twenty-five patients with moderate asthma were randomly divided into two groups : the patients in the group A received CsA treatment, with 3 mg·kg^-1·d^-1 of CsA orally, while in group B, with MTX treatment,10 mg of MTX orally, once a week. Both treatments persisted 12 weeks as the first period. After an interval of 4-6 weeks, another treatment period began. Then the clinical effectiveness and pulmonary functional change were observed when three treatment periods were finished. Results CsA showed a better clinical results and pulmonary functional index (FEV1%) in group A than in group B. Conclusion Low dose of CsA in treating moderate asthma exhibits better effectiveness. It is convenient to manipulate and safer for patients with no prominent side-effects.
作者 张策 胡茂胜
出处 《医药导报》 CAS 2007年第3期250-251,共2页 Herald of Medicine
关键词 环孢素 甲氨蝶呤 哮喘 Cycolosorin Methotrexate Asthma
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献2

  • 1中华医学会呼吸病学会.支气管哮喘的定义、诊断、严重程度分级及疗效判断标准[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1993,16:5-5.
  • 2中华医学会呼吸病学会哮喘学组,中华结核和呼吸杂志,1993年,16卷,哮喘增刊,5页

共引文献2024

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部