1Chan CC, Ng EH, Li CF, et al. Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoseopie sal pingeetomy for eetopie pregnancy[ J]. Hum Repred, 2003(10) :2175 - 2180.
5Dar GS, Sachs D,Strassburger D. Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients[J]. Hum Reprod, 2000(6):142- 144.
6Stranden A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U. Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment[J]. Hum Reprod, 2001(6) :1135 - 1139.
2[1]Dubuisson J, Aubriot F, MathieuL, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in 556 pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: implications for pre ventive management. Fertil Steril, 1991, 56:686-690
3[2]Verhulst G, Vandersteen N, van Steirteghem AC, et al. Bilateral salpingectomy does not compromise ovarian stimulation in an in- vitro fertilization -embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod, 1994, 9:624-628
4[3]DarP, Sachs GS, Strassburger D, etal. Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15: 142-144
5[4]Lass A, Ellenbogen A, Croucher C, et al. Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovlation in an in vitro fertilization - embryo transfer program Fertil Steril 1998, 70:1035 - 1038
6[5]Standell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom, et al. Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF teatment. Hum Reprod,2001, 16: 1135-1139
7[7]McComb P, Delbeke L. Decreasing the number of ovulations in the rabbitwith surgical division of the blood vessels between the fallopian tube and ovary.J Reprod Med 1984,29:827-829
8[8]shelton K,Butler L,Toner JP et al. Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx.Hum Reprod,1996,11:523-525
9[9]Surry ES,Schoolcraft WB. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer:salpingectom versus proximal tubal occlusion.Fertil Steril,2001, 75:612-617
10Akman MA, Goncia JE, Damewood MD, et al. Hydrosalpinx affects the implantation of previously cryopreserved embry, Ham Reprod, 1996,11 :1013.
3Tarek A,Gelbaya,Luciano G,et al.Ovarian response to gona￣dotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges[J].Fertility and Sterility,2006,85:1 464-1 468.
4Chan L C C W,Ng E H Y,Li C F,et al.Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy[J].Human Reproduction,2003,18(10):2 175-2 180.
5Koji N,Shirei O,Akira N,et al.Laparoscopic proximal tubal division can preserve ovarian reserve for infertility patients with hydrosalpinges[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2008 34(6):1 037-1 042.
6Dar P, Sachs GS, Strassburger D et al. ovarian fnnction before and after salpingectomy in artifical reprodutive technology patients [ J ] . Hum Reprod, 2000, 15 (1): 142.
7Lass A, Ellenbogen N, Croucher et al. Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulatian in an in vitro - fertilization - embryo transfer program [J) . Fertil Steril, 1998, 70 (6) : 1035.
8Verhulat G, Vandersteen N, Van steirteghem AC et al. Bilateral salpingectomy does not compromise ovarian stimulation in an iu vitro - fertilization-embryo transfer programme [J] . Hum Reprod, 1994, 9 (4) : 624.
9Zackrisson U, MikuniM, Peterson MC et aL Evidence for the involvem ent of blood flow - related mechanisms in the ovulatory process of the rat. Hum Repred, 2000, 15 (2) : 264.
10Chan CC, Ng EH, Li CF et al. Impaired ovarian biood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopicp regnaney. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18 (10) : 2175.
