期刊文献+

急性冠状动脉综合征患者急诊介入治疗临床研究 被引量:5

Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention treatment of acute coronary syndrome patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析本中心急性冠状动脉综合征患者的急诊介入治疗详细特征及趋势,以便更及时、有效地救治患者。方法对在我中心实施急诊介入治疗的230例急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行分析,总结病例的临床特征、介入治疗时间窗、治疗情况及近期预后。结果平均年龄增大、高龄及高危患者增多,治疗时间窗中各时间段(发病→急诊科→导管室→首次球囊扩张)均有缩短,其中导管室→首次球囊扩张时间缩短显著;药物支架、远端保护装置、血栓抽吸器、预防性冠状动脉联合注射防止无复流药物在近两年增长迅速,无血流发生率、主要心血管事件发生率及平均住院日显著下降,同时溶栓后介入治疗较直接介入治疗各种严重出血并发症无明显增加。结论急诊介入治疗是急性冠状动脉综合征的最有效治疗方法之一,各种新型辅助技术的使用可有效预防严重并发症的发生。 Objective To analyze the cases of the acute coronary syndrome treated with the emergency percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in this department in the past years. Methods 230 patients who suffered from the acute coronary syndrome were treated with the emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. Their clinical characteristics, operation time of PCI, operation information, and short-term prognosis were summarized. Results The average age of the patients was raised, the advanced age and high risk patients increased, the therapy time from chest pain onset to emergency visit, from emergency visit to catheter lab and from catheter lab to the first balloon angioplasty shortened, and the use of drug-eluting stent, distal protective device,aspiration thrombectomy catheter, injection of glyceryl trinitrate and diltiazem to the coronary artery became more frequent during recent 6 years. The rate of no/slow reflow and major adverse cardiac event decreased, and average length of hospital stay shortened. At the same time all kinds of hemorrhage in the patients who underwent emergency PCI after thrombolysis did not increase. Conclusion Emergency PCI is effective for acute coronary syndrome patients. The results suggest that the new adjuvant technology we used is effective to prevent complication of the acute coronary syndrome.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第3期159-162,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 急诊处理 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 预后 coronary disease emergency treatment angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1高润霖.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725. 被引量:5251
  • 2不稳定性心绞痛诊断和治疗建议[J].中华心血管病杂志,2000,28(6):409-412. 被引量:2702
  • 3The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions[J]. Eur Heart J,2005,26: 804-847.
  • 4Tamis-Holland JE, Palazzo A, Stebbins AL, et al. GUSTO Ⅱ-B Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. Benefits of direct angioplasty for women and men with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes Angioplasty (GUSTO Ⅱ-B) Angioplasty Substudy [J]. Am Heart J,2004,147:133-139.
  • 5The FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease: FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomized multicentre study[J]. Lancet, 1999,354:708-715.
  • 6Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina[J]. Lancet, 2002,360: 743-751.
  • 7颜红兵,朱小玲,高海,李南,李世英,艾辉,王健,柯元南.直接冠状动脉介入治疗时无复流高危患者是否应用Guardwire Plus装置的对比研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(3):138-141. 被引量:11
  • 8Nakamura T, Kubo N, Seki Y, et al. Effects of a distal protection device during primary stenting in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction[J]. Circ J,2004,68:763-768.
  • 9Wemer GS, Lang K, Kuehnert H, et al. Intracomnary veraparnil for reversal of no-reflow during coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002,57:444-451.
  • 10Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery[J]. N Engl J Med,2003,349:1315-1323.

二级参考文献9

  • 1颜红兵,高焱莎,万鹏,刘景山,柯元南.急诊经桡动脉应用Percusurge Guardwire装置一例[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2004,12(6):351-351. 被引量:1
  • 2颜红兵 柯元南.急性心肌梗死直接冠状动脉介入治疗中的无复流现象研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2003,31:21-23.
  • 3Kusuyama T, Kataoka T, Iida H, et al. Comparison of temporary occlusion and aspiration system versus the conventional method during coronary for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, 2004,94:1041-1043.
  • 4NakamuraT, Kubo N, Seki Y, et al. Effects of a distal protection device during primary stenting in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. Circ J, 2004,68:763-768.
  • 5Yip HK, Chen MC, Chang HW, et al. Transradial application of PercuSurge Guardwire device during primary percutaneous intervention of infarct-related artery with high-burden thrombus formation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2004,61:503-511.
  • 6Li SS, Lam CW, So YC, et al. The use of a distal occlusion balloon protection device in acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol, 2003, 92:281-284.
  • 7Huang Z, Katoh O, Nakarnura S, et al. Evaluation of the PercuSurge Guardwire plus temporary occlusion and aspiration system during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction, Catheter Cardiovasc lnterv, 2003, 60:443-451.
  • 8Stone GW, Webb J, Cox DA, et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2005,293:1063-1072.
  • 9Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation,2003,108:548-553.

共引文献7725

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部