期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

语用意义的形式化模型研究 被引量：1

On Computational Models for Pragmatic Meanings
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “语用意义”指话语在特定语境中传达出来的说话人意图。面向自然语言理解的语用意义形式化模型大体上可分为三类:一是以言语行为理论为基础的BDI(Belief/Desire/Intention,信念/愿望/意图)模型,二是以动态理解理论为出发点的DMS(Dialogue Management System,会话处理系统)模型;三是以概率理论为基础的Cue-based模型(线索模型)。本文拟从理论基础、模型体系等方面对上述三种模型予以评述,为面向中文自然语言理解的语用研究提供可借鉴的方法和理论。 The term ＂pragmatic meaning＂ is used to refer to intention of speaker conveyed in certain situations. Generally speaking, three computational models for the interpretation of pragmatic meanings have been recognized in the field of natural language understanding： BDI （Belief/Desire/Intention）,DMS （Dialogue Management System） and Cue-based Model. The present paper offers a survey of the three models and is intended to provide insights into pragmatic study for Chinese language understanding.
作者 杨平
机构地区 华南理工大学外国语学院
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期16-20,共5页 Foreign Language Education
基金 华南理工大学高水平大学建设"苗子项目"(项目编号:125-D76020)的一部分
关键词 语用意义 形式化模型 会话处理系统 线索模型 pragmatic meaning computational model DMS Cue-based Model
分类号 H030 [语言文字—语言学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Black et al. Pragmatics-based language understanding system [A]. In Proceedings of the ESPRIT Conference[C]. 1991 : 10-19.
  • 2Bunt, Harry. Dialogue pragmatics and context specifieation[A]. In Harry Bunt and William Black (eds.). Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics [C]. Manchester: Tilburg University / UMIST, 2000:81-150.
  • 3,lurafsky, Dan. Pragmatics and computational linguistics[A]. In Laurence R. Horn and George Ward(eds.). Handbooks of Pragmatics[C]. Oxford: Blaekwell, 2002:1-36.
  • 4Hintikka, J. Semantics for propositional attitudes[A]. In J. W. Davis Hockney and W. K. Wilson (eds.). Philosophical Logic [C]. Holland: D. Reidel, 1969:21-45.
  • 5Nivre J. Pragmatics through context management[J/OL]. Available from http ://www. nodali, sics. se/bibliotek/nodalida/1993-sthlm/NODA93-15/NODA93-15, htmh 1993.
  • 6Perrault,C. Raymond and James Allen. A plan-based analysis of indirect speech act [J]. American Journal of Computational Linguistics,1980,6:167-182.
  • 7Shrriberg et al. Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialogue acts in conversational speech? [J]. Language and Speech (Special Issue on Prosody and Conversation), 1998(41 ) : 439-487.
  • 8谷超豪．数学词典[M]．上海：上海辞书出版社，1997．
  • 9桂诗春.以概率为基础的语言研究[J].外语教学与研究,2004,36(1):3-9. 被引量：55

二级参考文献28

  • 1Aarts, B. 2000. Corpus linguistics, Chomsky and fuzzytree fragments [ A ]. In C. Mair & M. Hundt( eds. ). Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory [C]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • 2Aitchison, J. 1998. The Articulate Mammals: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics [M]. London: Routledge.
  • 3Alien, J & Seidenberg. 1999. The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks [A]. In B. MacWhinney ( ed. ). The Emergence of Language [C]. NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. , Pub lishers
  • 4Bates,E. , J. Elman, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi & K. Plunkett. 1989. Innateness and e mergentism [A]. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (eds.). A Companion to Cognitive Science [C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • 5Beaugrande, R. 1991. Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works [M]. London: Longman.
  • 6Bob, R., J. Hays & S. Jannedy. 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures [ M ]. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
  • 8Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Function of Language [M]. London: Arnold.
  • 9Halliday, M.A.K. 1991. Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar [A]. In K. Aijmer et al. (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics [C]. London: Longman
  • 10Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence [A]. In J. B. Pride et al ( eds. ). Sociolinguistics [C]. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

共引文献54

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

外语教学
2007年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部