期刊文献+

远缘链球菌6715及其耐氟菌株适应性耐酸能力的比较研究 被引量:2

Comparison of the Acid Adaptation between Streptococcus Sobrinus 6715 and Its Fluoride-resistant Strains.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨远缘链球菌6715(Streptococcus sobrinus 6715,以下简称S.6715)及其耐氟菌株的适应性耐酸能力。方法:在含有不同氟浓度的TSA上逐步诱导S.6715产生耐氟突变株(以下简称S.6715-FR)。通过测定在各种酸性pH值培养基中预酸化2 h后,能否使S.6715及其耐氟突变株抵抗致死性pH杀伤而存活及存活率,来测定其适应性耐酸能力的有无及大小。结果:S.6715属强适应性耐酸能力类菌株,最大生存率9.98%出现在pH5.5预酸化组,其耐氟突变株S.6715-FR亦具有强适应性耐酸能力,最大生存率10.55%出现在pH值5.0预酸化组。结论:在亚致死性pH值中生长能引发远缘链球菌6715及其耐氟菌株的某些生理变化,产生适应性耐酸能力,抵抗酸性环境的杀伤。 Objective: To determine the acid adaptation of Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and its fluoride - resistant strains. Methods: Fluoride -resistant strains of Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 was induced by increasing the concentration of fluoride in the TSA step by step. Adaptation to acid tolerance was measured by the ability of mid - exponential - phased cell to survive a 2 - hour exposure at killing pH. Results: Preliminary exposure of mid - exponential phase cells to a low, sub - lethal pH would enhance survival rate. The greatest viability (9.98%) of sobrinus 6715 appeared when cells were pre - acifled at pH 5.5 and the greatest viability ( 10.55% ) of fluoride - resistant strains of Streptococcus sorbrinus 6715 appeared when cells were pre - acified at pH 5. 0. Condution: Pre - acidification can trigger the introduction of some mechanisms to protect Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and its fluoride-resistant strains from acid killing.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2007年第1期20-23,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 远缘链球菌 耐氟菌株 耐酸反应 Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 Fluoride -resistant strains Acid tolerance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Vogel CL,Ma Y,Carey CM,et al.Increased overnight fluoride production[J].J Dent Res,1987,66(Spec Iss):148
  • 2Chansley PE,Kral TA.Transformation of fluoride resistance genes in Streptococcus mutans[J].Infect Immun,1989,57(7):1 968-1 970
  • 3Brown IR,White JO,Horton IM,et al.Effect of continuous fluoride gel use on plaque fluoride retention and microbial activity[J].J Dent Res,1983,62(6):746-751
  • 4van Loveren C,Buys JF,De Soet JJ,et al.Competition between fluoride-resistant and fluoride-sensitive Streptococcus mutans in rat dental plaque[J].Caries Res,1991,25(6):424-430
  • 5Svensater G,Larsson UB,Greif ECG,et al.Acid tolerance response and survival by oral bacteria[J].Oral Microbiol Immunol,1997,12:266-273
  • 6Ma YS,Curran TM,Marquis RE.Rapid procedure for acid adaptation of oral lactic-acid bacteria and further characterization of the response[J].Can J Microbiol,1997,43:143-148
  • 7Brussock SM,Kral TA.Effects of pH on expression of sodium fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans[J].J Dent Res,1987,66(10):1 594-1 596

同被引文献21

  • 1蔡爽,时清,李玉晶,杨东梅,李金陆,郑焱.蜂胶涂膜对变形链球菌生长和黏附的抑制作用[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(2):171-174. 被引量:6
  • 2Uzel A, Sorkun K, Oncag O, et al. Chemical compositions and antimicrobial activities of four different Anatolian propolis samples [ J ]. Microbiol Res, 2005, 160(2): 189-195.
  • 3Koo H, Pearson S K, Seott-Anne K, et al. Effects of apigenin and tt-farnesol on glucosyltransferase activity, biofilm viability and caries development in rats [J]. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2002, 17(6) : 337 -343.
  • 4Brown L R, White J O, Horton I M, et al. Effect of continuous fluoride gel use on plaque fluoride retention and microbial activity [ J]. J Dent Res, 1983, 62(6) : 746 -751.
  • 5Koo H, Rosalen P L, Cury J A, et al. Effects of compounds found in propolis on Streptococcus mutans growth and on glucosyltransferase activity[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2003, 46(5): 1302-1309.
  • 6Tamesada M, Kawabata S, Fujiwara T, et al. Synergistic effects of streptococcal glucosyltransferases on adhesive biofilm formation [ J ]. J Dent Res, 2004, 83 ( 11 ) : 874 - 879.
  • 7Santos F A, Bastos E M, Uzeda M, et al. Antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis and fractions against oral anaerobic bacteria [ J ]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2002, 80( 1 ) : 1 - 7.
  • 8Duarte S, Rosalen P L, Hayacibara M F, et al. The influence of a novel propolis on mutans Streptococci biofilms and caries development in rats[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2006, 51(1): 15 -22.
  • 9van Lovern C, Buys JF, de between fluoride- resistant and mutansin rat dental plaque[J] Soet J J, et al. Competition fluride-sensitive Streptococcus Caries Res, 1991, 25(6):424-430.
  • 10Brussock SM, Kral TA. Effects of PH on expression of sodium fluoride resistance in streptococcus mutans [J]. Dent Res, 1987, 66(10): 1594-1596.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部